2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of effective dose during hystrosalpingography procedures in certain hospitals in Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The least incidence cancer risk is about 14 per 100,000 (1:7000); this is considered a low risk and the highest incidence cancer risk is about 156 per 100,000; this is categorized as moderate risk [10]. Large variation in radiation dose values as recorded in this study is well documented in literature [11][12][13][14]. Radiation risk models are a function of patient dose and age at exposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The least incidence cancer risk is about 14 per 100,000 (1:7000); this is considered a low risk and the highest incidence cancer risk is about 156 per 100,000; this is categorized as moderate risk [10]. Large variation in radiation dose values as recorded in this study is well documented in literature [11][12][13][14]. Radiation risk models are a function of patient dose and age at exposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The impact of exposure parameters to entrance (ESD) in this study is significant as shown in Table 3 and 4. Literature has shown that the use of appropriate exposure parameters is a means of dose reduction strategy [11,15]. It is evidenced in this study that the choice of appropriate exposure parameters was responsible for the low ESD recorded in centre F. This implies that the implementation of appropriate dose reduction methods are more pronounced in centre F compared to centre E as shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%