The lack of access to electricity and clean cooking fuels is commonly referred to as energy poverty. In 2014, approximately 819 million people in India relied on solid fuels (including wood, crop residue, dung and coal) for cooking, the use of which is claimed to contribute to premature death caused by indoor air pollution, deforestation and gender inequality. In the interest of improved health and wellbeing, the Indian Government is, therefore, promoting a transition to the use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) as a cleaner cooking fuel. Dimethyl ether (DME) is a LPG compatible synthetic fuel, and the primary purpose of this thesis is to understand the use of domestically produced DME to offset a growing Indian LPG import requirement.The thesis starts by exploring the links between alternative liquid fuels production and use, human wellbeing, energy poverty reduction and sustainable development (Objective 1).The analysis finds that the proportional share of income used to purchase fuel is larger in developing countries when compared with richer, more developed countries, and that extended periods of high oil prices may exacerbate poverty in developing countries which are dependent on oil imports. In addition to reducing this vulnerability, there is a strong (potential) synergy between the production and use of alternative liquid fuels and several of the United Nations sustainable development goals. These include the provision of affordable and clean energy, promoting economic growth, climate action, reducing inequality and improving health and wellbeing. Affordability is a key driver in the adoption (and continued use) of cleaner cooking fuels globally. Therefore, to be considered viable, the cost of domestically produced DME would have to be equal or lower than the cost of imported LPG. In this context, the remainder of the thesis is devoted to the technoeconomic evaluation of producing DME from three different feedstocks, each offering a different greenhouse gas emissions intensity.The first evaluation (Objective 2) is based on the conversion of low-grade Indian coal in Jharkhand, where 18% of households used coal as a cooking fuel in 2011. Based on using a similar (energy equivalent) quantity of coal, it was found that producing DME (with associated excess electricity) would likely require oil prices greater than $73 per barrel to be cost competitive with imported LPG.iii Additionally, and due to higher overall process and cooking energy efficiency, this approach could result in 36% less coal being consumed when compared with direct use of the coal for cooking and as a means of producing an equivalent amount of electricity.India's metropolitan cities generate large quantities of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), 90% of which is disposed of onto unsanitary landfills, creating major environmental and health concerns. This second evaluation (Objective 3) therefore considers the techno-economic merits of reducing some of these impacts by converting a portion of the MSW generated in Kolkata into DME. Results su...