2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of R(t) based on illness onset data: An analysis of 1907–1908 smallpox epidemic in Tokyo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used methods proposed by Nakajo and Nishiura for calculating R t ( 53 , 54 ). The R t of COVID-19 was estimated as the epidemiological outcome, particularly its absolute and relative changes before and after the start of interventions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used methods proposed by Nakajo and Nishiura for calculating R t ( 53 , 54 ). The R t of COVID-19 was estimated as the epidemiological outcome, particularly its absolute and relative changes before and after the start of interventions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Nakajo and Nishiura ( 53 , 54 ) we assumed that x is the duration of infectiousness prior to illness onset, and we set x = 5 days (i.e., cases became infectious 5 days prior to the illness onset date). f s was assumed to follow a lognormal distribution with mean 5.2 days and variance 14.9 ( 55 ), and λ u was assumed to follow a gamma distribution with mean 12.9 days and variance 8.1 ( 56 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated R t using date of symptom onset and date of infection (13,31). When R t was classified by date of symptom onset, the expected case count on day t was proportional to R t and a convolution of case counts on previous days with the serial interval distribution.…”
Section: Estimating Epidemiologic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When R t was classified by date of symptom onset, the expected case count on day t was proportional to R t and a convolution of case counts on previous days with the serial interval distribution. When R t was classified by date of infection, the formula had a more complicated form and contained a double convolution, involving the incubation period and profile of infectiousness (31,32) (Appendix). Because some case records did not contain information on symptom onset date, we back-projected those cases from the date the case was confirmed to a presumptive date of symptom onset, using a timevaried distribution of the reporting delay.…”
Section: Estimating Epidemiologic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for ongoing epidemics, the appropriate methodology would be the estimation of the time-varying reproduction number ( R t ), which is defined as the average number of secondary cases per primary case at a given time t (Cori et al, 2013; Merl et al, 2009; Vegvari et al, 2021). To reduce distortions on the epidemic curve in outbreaks where the case counting is obtained by the date of notification the use of models that accounts for uncertainty, associated with delays between symptoms onset and the date of notification, would be an appropriate approach (Abbott et al, 2020; Gostic et al, 2020; Nakajo & Nishiura, 2022; Probert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%