2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the dispersion coefficient in rivers with riparian vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Una vez aproximados los perfiles de velocidad y fondo, se procedió a estimar el coeficiente de dispersión transversal en cada progresiva mediante la ecuación empírica desarrollada por Smeithlov [13] y utilizada por Deng et al [12], Carr y Rehmann [2], Perucca [14] y Shen [10] (ecuación 4). …”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified
“…Una vez aproximados los perfiles de velocidad y fondo, se procedió a estimar el coeficiente de dispersión transversal en cada progresiva mediante la ecuación empírica desarrollada por Smeithlov [13] y utilizada por Deng et al [12], Carr y Rehmann [2], Perucca [14] y Shen [10] (ecuación 4). …”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified
“…Although the dispersion of solutes is an important process in water bodies and many research studies are available in the literature (including recent ones by Perucca et al (2009), Deng et al (2010, Shen et al (2010) and Tealdi et al (2010) for example), extensive experimental investigations into the effect of sorption on the dispersion coefficient have not been reported. Sorption is a relatively slow reaction, and therefore a long flume is usually needed to investigate the effect of sorption on the dispersion coefficient experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of moments (Equation (4)) [13][14][15] is used to determine, experimentally, the longitudinal dispersion coefficient DL:…”
Section: Moment Methods and Experimental Parameters Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of Fa2, MRSE, and E indicate that the model representation of the experimental longitudinal dispersion coefficients is fairly acceptable. Moreover, the numerical estimation of this coefficient is very difficult; in the literature [7][8][9]14,17,38,[43][44][45][46] for natural rivers, there is a great disparity between the values of longitudinal dispersion coefficients calculated by different methods and empirical formulas. This shows that such a coefficient is difficult to estimate, its experimental determination is the fairest approach because it is based on spatio-temporal monitoring of pollutant concentrations in streams with the real effect of skewness, topography, and water storage areas.…”
Section: Foex (%) 60mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation