2019
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Variability and Genetic Parameters in Indica and Japonica Genotypes of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high estimates (>20%) of phenotypic (PCV) and genotypic (GCV) coefficients of variation were recorded in case of grains per panicle, spikelets per panicle, flag leaf area, biological yield per plant and grain yield per plant. These similar results have also been reported by earlier scientists (Khedikar et al, 2003;Saxena et al, 2005;Dhanwani et al, 2013;Gyawali et al, 2018 andParimala andDevi, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high estimates (>20%) of phenotypic (PCV) and genotypic (GCV) coefficients of variation were recorded in case of grains per panicle, spikelets per panicle, flag leaf area, biological yield per plant and grain yield per plant. These similar results have also been reported by earlier scientists (Khedikar et al, 2003;Saxena et al, 2005;Dhanwani et al, 2013;Gyawali et al, 2018 andParimala andDevi, 2019).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The high to very high estimates of direct selection parameters for above mentioned nine characters indicated that these would be ideal traits for improvement through selection in context of materials evaluated owing to existence of high genetic variability represented by high coefficients of variation and high transmissibility denoted by high heritability for them. The high estimates of direct selection parameters observed for the above characters are broadly in agreement with earlier reports in rice (Thakur et al, 1999;Kumar et al, 2001;Roy et al, 2001;Mohammad and Deva, 2002;Nayak et al, 2002;Yadav et al, 2002;Chaudhary et al, 2004;Shukla et al, 2004;Mall et al, 2005;Suman et al, 2005;Singh et al, 2006;Panwar et al, 2007;Babar et al, 2009;Anjaneyulu et al, 2010;Dhanwani et al, 2013;Lingaiah et al, 2014;Gyawali et al, 2018;Parimala and Devi, 2019)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high estimates of direct selection parameters observed for the above characters are broadly in agreement with earlier reports in rice (Anjaneyulu et al, 2010;Dhanwani et al, 2013;Lingaiah et al, 2014;Gyawali et al, 2018;Parimala and Devi 2019).…”
Section: Coefficient Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1) Days to 50% flowering, 2) Days to maturity, 3) Flag leaf length, 4) Flag leaf width, 5) Number of total tillers per hill, 6) Number of total panicles per hill, 7) Panicle length, 8) Number of spikelets per panicle, 9) Days to maturity, 10) Biological yield, 11) Harvest index, 12) Test weight, 13) Grain yield per hill [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%