1994
DOI: 10.1143/ptp.91.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Σ Well Depth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…⋆ This issue was formerly addressed by Ref. [14]. We thank Y. Kikukawa for informing us of this work.…”
Section: Perturbative Regularization Using Infinite Number Of Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…⋆ This issue was formerly addressed by Ref. [14]. We thank Y. Kikukawa for informing us of this work.…”
Section: Perturbative Regularization Using Infinite Number Of Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is related to the fact that in-plane optical phonons act like effective gauge fields that couple to the Dirac particles. Moreover, it has been known for a long time that the coupling of massive Dirac particles to gauge fields leads to Chern-Simons excitations [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. It is crucial to note that the Chern-Simons term is created by the expansion of the fermion determinant with respect to a vector field, where the latter is usually a gauge field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while there is an argument that parity invariant SU (2) with a single doublet doesn't exist, this argument does not fully extend to U (1) with a single Dirac fermion. If we replace the Dirac doublet in the SU (2) case by a Dirac fermion in representation j there will be a clash between parity and gauge invariance only when I ≡ 2 3 j(j +1)(2j +1) f 1 This view may be too dogmatic: see [3,4]. is odd: j = 1 2 , j = 5 2 , j = 9 2 , · · ·.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%