Estructura de poder y desafíos populares. La respuesta del régimen marroquí al Movimiento 20 de Febrero

Feliu, Laura; Izquierdo, Ferran Cortés

doi:10.18042/cepc/rep.174.07

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The King is the Prince of Believers, the Supreme Commander and the General Chief of Staff of the Royal Armed Forces -charges that are not just symbolic, but come with an important role as the protector of Islamic values and a tight grip and prerogatives over the management of the security sector. The evolution towards the hegemonic role of the King in the Moroccan regime of power has meant a process of power-accumulation through repression, co-opting, and a pactist strategy that has reinforced his primary role (Parejo Fernández, 2009;Feliu & Izquierdo Brichs, 2016). This power structure is obvious in the formal political structure of the State, and it is also replicated in other dimensions such as the control of economy and of natural resources, the religious sphere, etc.…”

Section: Concentrated and Diffused: The Securitization Of Terrorism A...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Securitization Revisited

Butler

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2020 selection and editorial matter, Michael J. Butler; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Michael J. Butler to be identified as the author of the editorial matter, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.With the exception of Chapter 6, no part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.Chapter 6 of this book is available for free in PDF format as Open Access from the individual product page at www.routledge.com. It has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

show abstract

Section: Concentrated and Diffused: The Securitization Of Terrorism A...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Securitization Revisited

Butler

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Siguiendo el mismo discurso, Laura Feliu se refiere al régimen sirio como un régimen de poder con élites y recursos concentrados. Estos se caracterizan por la presencia de élites fuertes y compactas con una gran capacidad represiva y muy poca capacidad de negociación, debido en gran parte a la concentración de los recursos del territorio (Feliu, 2016). Esta realidad tiende a conducir a respuestas represivas y autoritarias por parte de las autoridades, dinámica que se ha ejemplificado a la perfección en este conflicto.…”

Section: Siria Una Introducción a La Situación Actualunclassified

Reacciones Internacionales ante la destrucción de patrimonio en los casos de Siria y Yemen

Hoyo

2020

anal. juríd. - político

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La destrucción de patrimonio cultural está deviniendo una constante durante los conflictos armados, y los casos de Palmira y Sana’a son paradigmáticos de estas dinámicas. ¿Ha habido diferencias entre la problematización internacional de ambos? Teniendo en cuenta variables como el espacio que ocupan ambos estados en la estructura de poder internacional, los diferentes actores involucrados, el factor estado islámico y la vertiente identitaria del patrimonio cultural, esta investigación estudia su visibilización internacional mediante un análisis basado en las reacciones internacionales. El objetivo final es calibrar el ecosistema generado alrededor de cada caso de estudio. Para analizar los dos casos de estudio se confrontarán las diversas reacciones separadas por categorías. Estas han sido creadas a partir de los modelos propuestos por Heritage for Peace y Al Quntar y Daniels. El resultado final de la revisión constata una problematización diferenciada de ambos casos en la agenda pública internacional.

show abstract

“…The anti-authoritarian revolts of 2011 brought about the fall of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia, Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and Muammar Qaddafi in Libya. However, their impact in Algeria and Morocco was limited; although the protests led to the implementation of some reforms, they did not affect the power structure (Volpi 2013;Feliu and Izquierdo 2016). This article analyses the extent to which and how the political changes arising from the 2011 revolts on a sub-regional level affected the traditional pattern of rivalry between Algeria and Morocco that has structured bilateral relations since the countries gained independence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Doomed regionalism in a redrawn Maghreb? The changing shape of the rivalry between Algeria and Morocco in the post-2011 era

Larramendi

2018

The Journal of North African Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since independence, intra-Maghrebi relations have been marked by a pattern of bilateral rivalry between Morocco and Algeria, which has conditioned the construction of the Maghreb and hampered regional integration initiatives. This article discusses the impact of political transformations on this longstanding pattern of behaviour since 2011. While shared perceptions of threat initially prompted a short-lived 'defensive détente' between the two countries, this rapprochement soon yielded to a new period of rivalry. Moreover, the sub-regional context in the area is tumultuous, due to the deterioration of the security situation in Mali and Libya. Once again, the zerosum perspective that characterises Moroccan-Algerian relations has prevailed, preventing both countries from cooperating in tackling regional crises. Additionally, new arenas of rivalry have emerged in the Sahel, what some have called the 'new security border for Europe' and a space in which both countries are competing for the roles of stabilising force and regional mediator.Morocco has taken advantage of the growing interdependence around security issues between the Sahel and Maghreb after the collapse of the Libyan state and the instability in Mali to reposition itself as a regional actor in the Sahel space, challenging Algeria's traditional role in the region. The article examines the competition between the two countries to be seen by the international community as good partners, exporters of security and stability in the region. The rivalry has been reshaped in two principle areas: the competition for the role of mediator in the conflicts in Mali and Libya, and the competition to show expertise in the fight against terrorism and the processes of religious radicalisation. Finally, the rivalry between the two countries has extended into the rest of the African continent since Morocco's decision to abandon its empty-chair policy and join the African Union.

show abstract

Estructura de poder y desafíos populares. La respuesta del régimen marroquí al Movimiento 20 de Febrero

Cited by 10 publications

References 14 publications

Securitization Revisited

Securitization Revisited

Reacciones Internacionales ante la destrucción de patrimonio en los casos de Siria y Yemen

Doomed regionalism in a redrawn Maghreb? The changing shape of the rivalry between Algeria and Morocco in the post-2011 era

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About