Estudio de cohorte para evaluar la asociación entre el tiempo de inicio de nutrición con días de ventilación mecánica invasiva en pacientes con choque séptico

Abstract

Estudio de cohorte para evaluar la asociación entre el tiempo de inicio de nutrición con días de ventilación mecánica invasiva en pacientes con choque séptico Cohort study to evaluate the association between the start time of nutrition with days of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with septic shock Estudo de coorte para avaliar a associação entre o tempo de início da nutrição com os dias de ventilação mecânica invasiva em pacientes com choque séptico

Early Enteral Nutrition (within 48 h) for Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

“…The search retrieved 3759 references, and 3086 studies were screened after duplicate removal; a total of 37 references were reviewed in full text (Figure 1), 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], and 22 studies were excluded because they engaged with a different population, administered a distinct intervention or comparison, or implemented a non-relevant design. The details of included and excluded studies can be found in the supplemental digital content (Supplemental Table S2).…”

“…Studies were sponsored by non-governmental organizations [30,32,34,37,39], academic institutions [29], or by the pharmaceutical industry [26]. Three studies did not receive any funding [33,35,36], and the supporting source was not mentioned in five [27,28,31,38,40]. Five RCTs were retrieved [26][27][28][29]39], and ten studies were NRSs [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]40], providing a total sample size of 4166 participants.…”

“…Five RCTs were retrieved [26][27][28][29]39], and ten studies were NRSs [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]40], providing a total sample size of 4166 participants. The studies were carried out in Argentina [36], Australia [36], Brazil [36], Canada [36], China [30,32,34,39,40], Greece [36], Hong Kong [36], Japan [33], India [27,28], Mexico [35,36], Malesia [36], Panama [36], Saudi Arabia [36], the United States [29,31,37,38], and the United Kingdom [26,36]. Most of them were single-center studies [26,28,30,31,33,34,[37][38][39]...…”

“…Most of them were single-center studies [26,28,30,31,33,34,[37][38][39][40] and recruited their participants in teaching hospitals [27][28][29]33,34,37,38]. All studies were published in English, except for one that was published in Spanish [35]. Studies were sponsored by non-governmental organizations [30,32,34,37,39], academic institutions [29], or by the pharmaceutical industry [26].…”

“…Studies were sponsored by non-governmental organizations [30,32,34,37,39], academic institutions [29], or by the pharmaceutical industry [26]. Three studies did not receive any funding [33,35,36], and the supporting source was not mentioned in five [27,28,31,38,40].…”