Ethical Concerns About ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Useful Tool or the Tombstone of Original and Reflective Thinking?

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), the uprising technology of computer science aiming to create digital systems with human behavior and intelligence, seems to have invaded almost every field of modern life. Launched in November 2022, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a textual AI application capable of creating human-like responses characterized by original language and high coherence. Although AI-based language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in healthcare, ChatGPT has received controversial annotations from the scientific and academic communities. This chatbot already appears to have a massive impact as an educational tool for healthcare professionals and transformative potential for clinical practice and could lead to dramatic changes in scientific research. Nevertheless, rational concerns were raised regarding whether the pre-trained, AI-generated text would be a menace not only for original thinking and new scientific ideas but also for academic and research integrity, as it gets more and more difficult to distinguish its AI origin due to the coherence and fluency of the produced text. This short review aims to summarize the potential applications and the consequential implications of ChatGPT in the three critical pillars of medicine: education, research, and clinical practice. In addition, this paper discusses whether the current use of this chatbot is in compliance with the ethical principles for the safe use of AI in healthcare, as determined by the World Health Organization. Finally, this review highlights the need for an updated ethical framework and the increased vigilance of healthcare stakeholders to harvest the potential benefits and limit the imminent dangers of this new innovative technology.

Investigating the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource

“…(18) En segundo lugar, se han señalado problemas relacionados con la imprecisión en las citas, la falta de referencias adecuadas y la atribución incorrecta de información a fuentes inexistentes. (19) En tercer lugar, debido a que el conocimiento de ChatGPT se limita a datos anteriores a 2021, su utilidad como fuente de revisión de literatura actualizada y confiable es cuestionable. (20) Por último, se han planteado preocupaciones legales, especialmente en cuanto a los derechos de autor, que pueden surgir debido al uso de ChatGPT para la generación de contenido.…”