2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90217-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Étude de reproductibilité intra et inter-observateur de la version française du score de Constant au cours de la rééducation des coiffes opérées

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same report was observed in another study that assessed patients with adhesive capsulitis 30 . Although the strength subscale account for 25% of total score, this not seemed to interfere in the reliability for pain and strength subscales 25, 31. Recently, the minimally important change was verified to patients with subacromial pain 32 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same report was observed in another study that assessed patients with adhesive capsulitis 30 . Although the strength subscale account for 25% of total score, this not seemed to interfere in the reliability for pain and strength subscales 25, 31. Recently, the minimally important change was verified to patients with subacromial pain 32 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The alpha did not increase with the hypothetical exclusion of any item confirming the layout of the adapted score. Interestingly, the internal consistency of the original CMS ranged from 0.60 to 0.75 25, 26. A systematic review suggested that the low alpha values may indicate that the CMS items measure different aspects of shoulder function 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High test-retest reliability of the Constant-Murley scale was previously shown for intra-observer conditions corresponding to ours. 2,22,23 Lower ICC values reported corresponded to the interobserver reliability of the Constant-Murley scale that we did not investigate. According to the planned thresholds we used to categorize the ICC, we found no difference in test-retest reliability between the three scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…28 Nevertheless, our results agree with high testretest reliabilities previously reported for the DASH questionnaire, SPADI and Constant-Murley scale. [2][3][4]20,[22][23][24] All our assessments were performed by the same assessor. Even if the DASH questionnaire and the SPADI are self-administered, this point is to underline for the Constant-Murley scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total is on 100 and a higher score indicates a higher shoulder function. According to a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant score, the reliability of this questionnaire is excellent (ICC, 0.89; 95 % confidence interval, 0.79–0.94) [37], and the internal consistency, evaluated with the Cronbach alpha, ranges from 0.60 to 0.75 suggesting that it measures different aspects of function [38, 39]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%