“…80 Along these lines, in Canadian Oil Company Sweden AB, Anders Rantén v. Riksåklagaren the CJEU held that the 'objective' of ensuring 'a high level of protection of human health and the environment' is 'capable of justifying any hindrance to the free movement of goods'. 81 Contrary to the ECJ, the ECtHR has never recognised an independent (thirdgeneration) principle, or right, to environmental protection. By contrast, the Court has afforded environmental protection through specific first-and secondgeneration fundamental rights, such as the right to health and private and family life, 82 which has been defined as a 'minimum level of environmental protection'.…”