2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.04.1324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eus-Guided Versus Percutaneous Liver Abscess Drainage: A Multicenter Collaborative Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few previously conducted studies have reported that the technical and clinical success rates of EUSguided drainage for hepatic abscesses were 88.9% to 100% and 71.4% to 100%, and the recurrence rates were 0% to 7%, retrospectively. [22][23][24] Although a prospective study involving a larger number of patients is required to confirm the utility of EUS-guided drainage for symptomatic SHC, this seems to be an emerging method with high technical and clinical success rates similar to percutaneous drainage combined with sclerotherapy. Moreover, this method may shorten the length of hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few previously conducted studies have reported that the technical and clinical success rates of EUSguided drainage for hepatic abscesses were 88.9% to 100% and 71.4% to 100%, and the recurrence rates were 0% to 7%, retrospectively. [22][23][24] Although a prospective study involving a larger number of patients is required to confirm the utility of EUS-guided drainage for symptomatic SHC, this seems to be an emerging method with high technical and clinical success rates similar to percutaneous drainage combined with sclerotherapy. Moreover, this method may shorten the length of hospital stay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%