2020
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10020199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating a Controlled-Release Fertilizer for Plant Establishment in Floating Elements for Bioretention Ponds

Abstract: In bioretention ponds proposed to manage urban runoff, floating elements with anchored macrophytes plants improve nutrient and pollutants removal and provide aesthetic benefits. To prompt the establishment and initial growth of plants in floating elements with substrate, the application of Osmocote (a controlled-release fertilizer) in tablet form was proposed. In a confined environment, eight treatments were compared, combining two substrates (peat and zeolite at a ratio of 1:1 or 2:1 v/v), two levels of ferti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EC of the leachate during the first weeks of the study is associated with the nutrient release from the controlled release fertilizer and with the soluble salts leached from the substrate [ 49 ], in addition to the fact that the plants absorb them much easier [ 50 ]. The conductivity increases due to the release of nutrients from the fertilizer [ 51 ]. In this sense, we can observe that the EC was higher in this work, especially in the treatments where both nano- and conventional fertilizers were applied (0/100, 25/75, 75/25 and 100/0).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EC of the leachate during the first weeks of the study is associated with the nutrient release from the controlled release fertilizer and with the soluble salts leached from the substrate [ 49 ], in addition to the fact that the plants absorb them much easier [ 50 ]. The conductivity increases due to the release of nutrients from the fertilizer [ 51 ]. In this sense, we can observe that the EC was higher in this work, especially in the treatments where both nano- and conventional fertilizers were applied (0/100, 25/75, 75/25 and 100/0).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%