2022
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2022.2062480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating alternative variations of Negative Binomial–Lindley distribution for modelling crash data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the occurrence of motorcycle crashes may exhibit varying levels of dispersion due to factors such as a variety of road conditions, trafc density, and weather conditions. In addition, the NB model was used in this study because of the general relationship between each prediction variable and crash frequency [19,54,55] and shows the efects of not accounting for spatial heterogeneity. Te relationship is shown as follows:…”
Section: Negative Binomial (Nb) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the occurrence of motorcycle crashes may exhibit varying levels of dispersion due to factors such as a variety of road conditions, trafc density, and weather conditions. In addition, the NB model was used in this study because of the general relationship between each prediction variable and crash frequency [19,54,55] and shows the efects of not accounting for spatial heterogeneity. Te relationship is shown as follows:…”
Section: Negative Binomial (Nb) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologically, researchers have recently utilised relatively advanced statistical models for crash data analysis and developing SPFs [29,[31][32][33]. Nevertheless, consensus on applying the conventional NB model for developing crash prediction models remains unmatched across the transportation safety community, partly because of its ability to accommodate over-dispersion and partly because of the ease associated with its estimation procedure and interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%