Evaluating China’s Environmental Management and Risks Avoidance Policies and Regulations on Offshore Methane Hydrate Extraction

Abstract

<jats:p>Methane hydrates (hereinafter, MH), for many reasons, are widely recognized as a form of sustainable energy due to their environmentally friendly nature. MH, while burning, produce fresh water, which could in turn offer one possible solution to worldwide shortages of water. MH also maintains the capacity to change the landscape of the global energy supply. According to recent scientific evaluations, the potential global supply of MH is even higher than the total storage of traditional crude oil and conventional natural gas. However, its offshore extraction process could be linked to both catastrophic and non-catastrophic events that may contribute to global warming and climate change, cause harm to human health and life, endanger the flora and fauna, and threaten the very global environment as a whole. Therefore, from a legal viewpoint, an efficient and effective system of civil liability rules seem crucial to control the risks, and to compensate the victims to which damages may occur. This article takes into consideration China’s legal framework in assessing the risks connected to MH offshore extraction. Such a choice for examination is justified by China’s leading position for implementing the technology necessary for extracting MH. This analysis shows that China’s current legal instruments are still far from fully equipped to prevent the risks associated with the offshore extraction of MH, as well as to offer effective remedies for the victims once any damages have occurred. Therefore, more efficient measures and remedies should be considered (or even imposed) to address the specific risks of offshore methane hydrate extraction. Indeed, in the past few decades, China’s environmental protection laws and regulations have mainly focused on the environmental risks that may occur during the process of extracting conventional resources; however, they do not address methane hydrates specifically. This presents a legal challenge for environmental protection laws. The potentially catastrophic events that may occur as a result of the offshore MH extraction processes in particular present a legal challenge for environmental protection laws in China and across the globe. Thus, this article focuses on how to prevent these risks before they even occur, followed by a careful attempt to address compensation efforts for any damages caused by said catastrophes.</jats:p>

Worldwide regulations and policy trends on gas production from gas hydrates

“…Moreover, they said that there are limited documents related to the national gas hydrate policies regulating gas hydrate field-scale studies in the world. Yan et al (2020) evaluate China's environmental management and risk avoidance policies and regulations on the exploitation of gas hydrates. They said that the current legal framework in China is still far from preventing the risks associated with gas production from gas hydrates and this legal framework does not consider human health and mostly concentrated on environmental effects.…”

Public Engagement Impact on Sustainable Waste Management in Indonesia: Examining Public Behavior

“…The benefits of public participation in EA have been demonstrated both theoretically and practically. One key theoretical argument is that participation upholds the fundamental values of democracy and enhances the social fabric of society (Feng et al, 2020;Yan et al, 2020). This viewpoint positions EA as a primary mechanism through which the public can directly engage in decisions that affect them.…”

Key factors influencing Indonesia’s solid waste management maturity (a study of piyungan landfill, yogyakarta)

“…Theoretically and practically, public EA participation is beneficial. Participation modernizes democracy's fundamental [17,18]. This statement identifies EA as a primary tool for public participation in decision-making.…”