Evaluating Financial Toxicity in Urologic Practice

Glazyrine, Vassili; Au, Daniel; Starkey, Jared; Thompson, Jeffrey; Parker, W.

doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.040

Urology

2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.040

|View full text |Cite

Evaluating Financial Toxicity in Urologic Practice

Vassili Glazyrine¹,

Daniel Au²,

Jared Starkey³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…bags, such as odor and skin irritation, can have negative effects on patients' self-image and social ability 15,16 . In addition, factors such as the need for lifelong placement and regular replacement of ureteral stents, the consumption of stoma-related products, and the management of complications further increase the economic burden on patients 17,18 , thereby further affecting their physiological, psychological, and social functions 19,20 . However, the traditional evaluation system focuses primarily on treatment outcomes and often overlooks these potential impacts 21,22 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and preliminary validation of a PROS scale for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stoma

Lu,

Hong,

Xiong

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor, and patients who have undergone radical cystectomy and urinary diversion require a lifelong abdominal stoma. This greatly affects their physiological, psychological, and social well-being. However, there is currently a lack of a self-assessment outcome scale specifically designed for bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas. Therefore, we developed and validated a self-assessment outcome scale (PROS-BCAS) for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas. The scale was initially developed through literature research and expert consultation, and it comprised four dimensions: physiological, psychological, social, and treatment, with a total of 66 items. After item analysis, 44 items were retained. We collected scale data from 382 patients to examine its validity and reliability. The results showed that the PROS-BCAS scale had good content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.992), construct validity (KMO > 0.6), and discriminant validity (correlation coefficient 0.404–0.870). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients (0.801–0.954), test–retest reliability (0.778–0.956), and split-half reliability (0.896–0.977) all demonstrated good internal consistency for each dimension and the overall scale. The study demonstrated that the PROS-BCAS scale is a reliable and valid tool for accurately assessing the health-related quality of life of bladder cancer patients with abdominal stomas, providing reference for developing individualized clinical care plans.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and preliminary validation of a PROS scale for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stoma

Lu,

Hong,

Xiong

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Financial Burden of Localized and Metastatic Bladder Cancer

Scilipoti,

Moschini,

et al. 2024

European Urology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Evaluating Financial Toxicity in Urologic Practice

Cited by 2 publications

References 14 publications

Development and preliminary validation of a PROS scale for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stoma

Development and preliminary validation of a PROS scale for Chinese bladder cancer patients with abdominal stoma

The Financial Burden of Localized and Metastatic Bladder Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About