Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

BackgroundDespite improvement in abdominal morbidity with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared to prior abdominally‐based free flap breast reconstruction, abdominal bulge, and hernia rates have been cited anywhere from 2% to 33%. As a result, some surgeons utilize mesh or other reinforcement upon donor‐site closure, but its benefit in preventing abdominal wall morbidity has not been well‐defined for DIEP flaps. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate DIEP donor‐site closure techniques and the impact of mesh type and plane on abdominal‐wall morbidity including hernia and bulge, relative to primary fascial closure.MethodsMEDLINE, PubMED, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were systematically reviewed for studies evaluating DIEP flap breast reconstruction abdominal‐donor site closure, where any mesh reinforcement or primary fascial closure was specified, and postoperative outcomes of hernia and/or abdominal bulge were reported. Analysis was performed in Review Manager (RevMan) evaluating mesh use, type, and plane relative to primary fascial closure, using the Mantel–Haenszel method to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of significance level p < .05, and a random effects model to account for inter‐study heterogeneity.ResultsOf the 2791 DIEP patients across 11 studies, 1901 patients underwent primary closure and 890 were repaired with mesh. When hernia and/or bulge were combined into a single complication, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce its odds compared to primary closure (OR = 0.69, p = .20). Similarly, the use of any mesh did not significantly reduce the odds of bulge alone compared to primary closure (OR = 0.62, p = .43). However, the odds of hernia alone were significantly reduced by 72% with any mesh use (OR = 0.28, p = .03).ConclusionMesh use was significantly associated with decreased odds of hernia alone with DIEP flap surgery, but there was no difference in bulge or combined hernia/bulge rates. As bulge is the more common abdominal morbidity after DIEP flap harvest in a patient with no prior abdominal surgery or risk factor for hernia, mesh use is not indicated in abdominal closure of all DIEP patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to characterize the specific indications for mesh use in the setting of DIEP flap surgery.

A New Era in Perforator Flap Surgery for Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Robotic versus Standard Harvest of Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps

“…32 This has led to a preference for using mesh when significant abdominal wall disruption or denervation of the rectus muscle occurs in the studied group. 33,34 Among the sDIEP patients, 13 out of 24 (54.2%) required mesh to address these issues. In contrast, none of the rDIEP patients needed mesh, highlighting a notable difference between the two surgical approaches.…”