Evaluating Patient Identification Practices During Intrahospital Transfers: A Human Factors Approach

Abstract

Introduction: Reliable patient identification is essential for safe care, and failures may cause patient harm. Identification can be interfered with by system factors, including working conditions, technology, organizational barriers, and inadequate communications protocols. The study aims to explore systems factors contributing to patient identification errors during intrahospital transfers. Methods:We conducted a qualitative study through direct observation and interviews with porters during intrahospital patient transfers. Data were analyzed using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety human factors model. The patient transfer process was mapped and compared with the institutional Positive Patient Identification policy. Potential system failures were identified using a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis.Results: A total of 60 patient transfer handovers were observed. In none of the evaluable cases observed, patient identification was conducted correctly according to the hospital policy at every step of the process. The principal system factor responsible was organizational failure, followed by technology and team culture issues. The Failure Modes and Effects Analysis methodology revealed that miscommunication between staff and lack of key patient information put patient safety at risk. Conclusions:Patient identification during intrahospital patient transfer is a high-risk event because several factors and many people interact. In this study, the disconnect between the policy and the reality of the workplace left staff and patients vulnerable to the consequences of misidentification. Where a policy is known to be substantially different from work as done, urgent revision is required to eliminate the serious risks associated with the unguided evolution of working practice.

Challenges experienced during pharmacy automation and robotics implementation in JCI accredited hospital in the Arabian Gulf area: FMEA analysis-qualitative approach

“…FMEA was used in a descriptive qualitative research method, using observation, interviews, and documentation as data collection techniques to measure Quality Risk Management ( Ratnamurni et al, 2022 ). Another qualitative study was conducted during intrahospital patient transfers, which included direct observation and interviews with porters where the patient transfer procedure was documented and compared to institutional policies and procedures, and the FMEA was used to identify potential system fault ( Suclupe et al, 2023 ). Likewise, using the FMEA technique, an institution did descriptive research examining the failure modes and their impacts qualitatively and quantitatively; they created an FMEA team, and the targeted processes were outlined in a flowchart ( Yazdanian et al, 2022 ).…”

Errors in medicine: punishment versus learning medical adverse events revisited – expanding the frame

“…Nevertheless, some risk areas have been identified, for example 'where the ice is thin', like during patient transferals and transitions. In these circumstances, sober use of tools such as checklists and routine descriptions seems indicated [5]. However, still the possibility for new risks must be kept in mind.…”

Analysis of Nurse Role Determinants in Patient Safety Implementation at Royal Prima Marelan Hospital Inpatients

“…Patient misidentification can occur in all aspects of diagnosis and treatment (WHO, 2008). Several circumstances can lead to errors in identifying patients, including patients who are anaesthetized or sedated, experiencing disorientation or complete unconsciousness, allowing changing beds, rooms, and locations within the hospital, may have sensory disabilities, and the consequences of other situations (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2019;Suclupe et al, 2023). Efforts to achieve excellent and correct patient identification require methods that can be trusted/reliable.…”