Evaluating preterm infants with the Bayley-III: Patterns and correlates of development

Greene, Michelle M.; Patra, Kousiki; Nelson, Michael N.; Silvestri, Jean M.

doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.05.024

Cited by 64 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The cognitive abilities that have shown to be statistically significant were the ability to grasp and handle objects and construction and object permanence. This result supports the statement in the literature suggesting that one of the prerequisites for language development in the preoperational period is the ability of object handling and permanence (23)(24)(25) .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Desenvolvimento cognitivo e linguagem em prematuros

Viana¹,

Andrade

Lopes³

2014

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To correlate aspects of cognitive and language development in preterm infants of 24 and 42 months of chronological age. Methods: A quantitative, analytical, and cross-sectional study was conducted between February and December 2012. The sample comprised ten preterm infants with a chronological age ranging between 24 and 42 months. These children were subjected to the Bayley Scales of Infant Development -III and evaluated according to cognitive, receptive, and expressive language subscales. Results: A statistical significance was observed when correlating chronological and corrected age with the age of cognitive and language development. In the correlation of chronological age with cognitive and language abilities, a statistical significance was observed regarding the ability to grasp and handle objects, and in the construction and object permanence capacity. In the correlation of developmental age with cognition and language abilities, a statistical significance was observed in all cognitive abilities. A significant correlation was not observed between ages of expressive language development and receptive language ability. Conclusion: A correlation between chronological and corrected ages with the ages of cognitive and language development was confirmed. Receptive and expressive language abilities showed a distinct development; however, they were dependent on the cognition. As crianças foram submetidas à aplicação da Escala de DesenvolvimentoInfantil de Bayley -III e avaliadas mediante as subescalas de cognição, linguagem receptiva e expressiva. Resultados: Observou-se significân-cia estatística na correlação das idades cronológica e corrigida com as idades do desenvolvimento cognitivo e de linguagem. Na correlação da idade cronológica com as habilidades cognitiva e de linguagem, houve significância estatística quanto à capacidade de apreensão e manipulação de objetos e na construção e habilidade de permanência dos objetos. Na correlação da idade do desenvolvimento com as habilidades de cognição e linguagem, constatou-se significância estatística em todas as habilidades cognitivas. Não houve correlação significativa entre idade do desenvolvimento de linguagem expressiva e habilidades de linguagem receptiva. Conclusão: Confirmou-se correlação das idades cronológica e corrigida com a idade do desenvolvimento cognitivo e de linguagem.As habilidades de linguagem receptiva e expressiva mostraram-se com desenvolvimento distinto, todavia, dependentes da cognição.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Surveys describe differences in the development of receptive and expressive language (24)(25)(26) . We observed discrepancies in receptive language abilities when compared to the age of expressive development capacities, since in this phase children enhance expressive language by repeating sounds without understanding their meaning.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Desenvolvimento cognitivo e linguagem em prematuros

Viana¹,

Andrade

Lopes³

2014

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, this scale has been criticized by some researchers for overestimating developmental abilities in very preterm children at 2 years of age (Anderson, De Luca, Hutchinson, Roberts, & Doyle, 2010;Vohr et al, 2012), and others described a difference in abilities in the first and second years of life characterized by a decline in mean cognitive and language scores, but stability of the motor scores (Greene et al, 2012). Currently, relatively little is known about the developmental performances revealed by BSID-III in LP populations in the first two years of life, apart from one study that compared the BSID-III scores with Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3), a parent-completed developmental screening questionnaire (Schonhaut, Armijo, Schönstedt, Alvarez, & Cordero, 2013;Squires, Bricker, & Potter, 1997).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous investigations found that at 1-4 years of age, LP have an increased risk of presenting developmental delay (Nepomnyaschy, Hegyi, Ostfeld, & Reichman, 2012;Voigt, Pietz, Pauen, Kliegel, & Reuner, 2012;Woythaler, McCormick, & Smith, 2011). Some of them analyzed the infant perinatal course and socio-demographic data to be included as possible independent risk factors for developmental outcome, especially in case of studying middle-long term cognitive and language development (Freeman Duncan et al, 2012;Greene, Patra, Nelson, & Silvestri, 2012;Morag et al, 2013). However, findings on LP's developmental outcome are still contradictory (McGowan et al, 2012;Romeo et al, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One-year neurodevelopmental outcome of very and late preterm infants: Risk factors and correlation with maternal stress

Coletti

Caravale

Gasparini

et al. 2015

Infant Behavior and Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Michelle M Greene ve ark. (22) bir yaşındaki prematüreleri Bayley III ile değerlendirdikleri çalışmada, bilişsel skorun, ifade edici dil ve kaba motor skora göre daha iyi olduğunu rapor etmişlerdir. Yazarlar neonatal risk faktörlerinden, İUBG, anormal kraniyal USG, bronkopulmoner displazinin her üç alanda kötü etkisine dikkat çekmişlerdir.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified