2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrpr.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating pulmonary nodules to detect lung cancer: Does Fleischner criteria really work?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since nodule size is an important risk factor and the definition of IPNs is not very well defined (6) with changing guidelines, we examined the performance when comparing malignant and benign pulmonary nodules that were similar in size ranges. We calculated the performance of the 41-probe classifier across the various nodule size ranges using baseline positive thresholds of 4 mm from the NLST study (24) 6 mm and 8 mm as discussed in the recent reports from the Fleischner Society (8) and the Lung Rads (7) as well as a baseline threshold of 10 mm. The ROC-AUCs and the specificities when the sensitivity is held at a performance of 90% were calculated for all possible ranges for the selected thresholds for training and independent validation sets (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since nodule size is an important risk factor and the definition of IPNs is not very well defined (6) with changing guidelines, we examined the performance when comparing malignant and benign pulmonary nodules that were similar in size ranges. We calculated the performance of the 41-probe classifier across the various nodule size ranges using baseline positive thresholds of 4 mm from the NLST study (24) 6 mm and 8 mm as discussed in the recent reports from the Fleischner Society (8) and the Lung Rads (7) as well as a baseline threshold of 10 mm. The ROC-AUCs and the specificities when the sensitivity is held at a performance of 90% were calculated for all possible ranges for the selected thresholds for training and independent validation sets (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) detected lung nodules ≥4 mm in diameter in 40% of patients screened, with 96.4% being false positives over the 3 rounds of screening (6). To reduce this high FPR the recent Lung-RADs classification (7) and new guidelines from the Fleischner group (8) set the detection of nodules ≥6mm as the positive threshold. However, positive CT scans remain particularly problematic for that class of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs), which range in size from 6 to 20 mm for which the best course of clinical action is not well specified (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 It is reported that the nodules with the diameter <4 mm account for 59.5% of uncalcified pulmonary nodules. 3 Existence of silicosis is well known since ancient times; but it has in present times grown to a global public health problem, reporting thousands of cases every year. Although, the prevalence has decreased compared with past decades, it is still an obscured and underreported disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current radiological practices, silicosis is typically characterized as widespread, well‐defined small pulmonary nodules <4 mm . It is reported that the nodules with the diameter <4 mm account for 59.5% of uncalcified pulmonary nodules . Existence of silicosis is well known since ancient times; but it has in present times grown to a global public health problem, reporting thousands of cases every year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that previous studies are limited to small nodules with a diameter larger than 3 mm, no study on micro-nodules (diameter < 3 mm) has been done. It is reported that the pulmonary nodules with the diameter < 4 mm account for 59.5% in a total of 210 uncalcified pulmonary nodules [ 17 ]. Moreover, many recommendations have been given for the management of micro-nodules by different institutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%