2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3124341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Registrations of Serial Sections With Distortions of the Ground Truths

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 158 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using such benchmark data could be used to verify and validate results found by other researchers who already considered expert-based matching as ground truth, e.g., [ 21 ] in an attempt to reduce inductive bias. A ground truth-based evaluation set for the benchmarking for the reconstruction of 3D-volumes by 2D ⟶ 2D registration has already been proposed by Lobachev et al [ 87 ]. Furthermore, different staining protocols need to be accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using such benchmark data could be used to verify and validate results found by other researchers who already considered expert-based matching as ground truth, e.g., [ 21 ] in an attempt to reduce inductive bias. A ground truth-based evaluation set for the benchmarking for the reconstruction of 3D-volumes by 2D ⟶ 2D registration has already been proposed by Lobachev et al [ 87 ]. Furthermore, different staining protocols need to be accounted for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%