2007
DOI: 10.1002/csr.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating social performance in the context of an ‘audit culture’: a pilot social review of a gold mine in Papua New Guinea

Abstract: The growth of sustainable development frameworks that emphasize the social dimension has created a need for new approaches to evaluate social performance. The paper describes the design and pilot of a social review conducted at the Lihir Gold Mine in Papua New Guinea. The aim was to investigate more integrated measures -understood as combining qualitative and quantitative measures, and bridging international and local community standards -of social performance. The paper discusses the demands of time and resou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Idemudia and Osayande (2016), SCOTDI is a composite index for weighing, scoring and ranking the performance of GMoU cluster based on five key criteria (transparency and accountability, inclusiveness and participation, governance and democracy, business climate and progress towards sustainability), which are consistent with international best practice in development discourse. These five criteria constitute the criteria reference system and are similar to the criteria used by a similar study that undertook a social performance review of gold mine in Papua New Guinea (Macintyre et al, 2008). Idemudia and Osayande (2008) narrated that the specific objectives of SCOTDI include providing a framework for ranking GMoU clusters, provoking healthy rivalries among the GMoU clusters through capacity building interventions, business value expectations, and reputation enhancement opportunities.…”
Section: The Global Memorandum Of Understanding (Gmou) Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Idemudia and Osayande (2016), SCOTDI is a composite index for weighing, scoring and ranking the performance of GMoU cluster based on five key criteria (transparency and accountability, inclusiveness and participation, governance and democracy, business climate and progress towards sustainability), which are consistent with international best practice in development discourse. These five criteria constitute the criteria reference system and are similar to the criteria used by a similar study that undertook a social performance review of gold mine in Papua New Guinea (Macintyre et al, 2008). Idemudia and Osayande (2008) narrated that the specific objectives of SCOTDI include providing a framework for ranking GMoU clusters, provoking healthy rivalries among the GMoU clusters through capacity building interventions, business value expectations, and reputation enhancement opportunities.…”
Section: The Global Memorandum Of Understanding (Gmou) Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oskarsson and von Malmborg (2005) argue that management systems are not in themselves suffi cient to achieve a proactive approach on management within the framework of sustainable development. Management systems in mining are also closely tied to an emerging audit culture, the latter of which has been critiqued as tangential to actual social performance (Macintyre et al, 2007).…”
Section: Another Industry Interviewee Commentedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, we believe independent assurance services could further provide a full seal of approval to stakeholders that these companies have actually complied with rules and regulations. However, we are mindful of the fact that such verifi cation of environmental and social disclosures has its own perils; and objections to the methods of verifi cation are bound to arise in due course (Macintyre et al, 2007).…”
Section: Extent Of Ewa Responsibility Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%