2022
DOI: 10.1002/eap.2602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating sources of bias in pedigree‐based estimates of breeding population size

Abstract: Applications of genetic-based estimates of population size are expanding, especially for species for which traditional demographic estimation methods are intractable due to the rarity of adult encounters. Estimates of breeding population size (N S ) are particularly amenable to genetic-based approaches as the parameter can be estimated using pedigrees reconstructed from genetic data gathered from discrete juvenile cohorts, therefore eliminating the need to sample adults in the population. However, a critical e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, microhaplotypes also contained higher inter‐laboratory scoring errors. These data could provide new opportunities to assess the abundance of local walleye populations using genetic techniques such as close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) and rarefaction, which benefit from multiallelic markers (Bravington et al, 2016 ; White et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, microhaplotypes also contained higher inter‐laboratory scoring errors. These data could provide new opportunities to assess the abundance of local walleye populations using genetic techniques such as close‐kin mark‐recapture (CKMR) and rarefaction, which benefit from multiallelic markers (Bravington et al, 2016 ; White et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 25 rivers still support their reproduction [7,8]. The abundances of adult sturgeon in these spawning populations vary greatly, with census estimates ranging from the low hundreds for the Delaware River [9] to less than a thousand for the Hudson River, New York [10] and Altamaha River, Georgia [11,12] and about 20,000 for the Saint John River, New Brunswick [13]. Because population sizes vary so greatly [1], the vulnerabilities of individual populations to more severe declines and extirpation also differ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%