Evaluating the application of multipollutant exposure metrics in air pollution health studies

Abstract

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f oBackground: Health effects associated with air pollution are typically evaluated using a single pollutant approach, yet people are exposed to mixtures consisting of multiple pollutants that may have independent or combined effects on human health. Development of exposure metrics that represent the multipollutant environment is important to understand the impact of ambient air pollution on human health. Objectives: We reviewed existing multipollutant exposure metrics to evaluate how they can be applied to understand associations between air pollution and health effects. Methods: We conducted a literature search using both targeted search terms and a relational search in Web of Science and PubMed in April and December 2013. We focused on exposure metrics that are constructed from ambient pollutant concentrations and can be broadly applied to evaluate air pollution health effects. Results: Multipollutant exposure metrics were identified in 57 eligible studies. Metrics reviewed can be categorized into broad pollutant grouping paradigms based on: 1) source emissions and atmospheric processes or 2) common health outcomes. Discussion: When comparing metrics, it is apparent that no universal exposure metric exists; each type of metric addresses different research questions and provides unique information on human health effects. Key limitations of these metrics include the balance between complexity and simplicity as well as the lack of an existing "gold standard" for multipollutant health effects and exposure. Conclusions: Future work on characterizing multipollutant exposure error and joint effects will inform development of improved multipollutant metrics to advance air pollution health effects research and human health risk assessment.

A CFD modeling study in an urban street canyon for ultrafine particles and population exposure: The intake fraction approach

“…The non-dimensionality of this parameter can provide useful information: on the advantages or disadvantages of different policies, on emission reduction scenarios and on exposure potentials of different sources (Oakes et al, 2014;Solomon et al, 2012;Tainio et al, 2014). On the other hand, the parameter of intake fraction is limited by uncertainty and sensitivity problems and is dependent by assumptions (Carella and Mudu, 2009).…”

Characterizing multi-pollutant air pollution in China: Comparison of three air quality indices

“…In the past years, various methods, such as the statistical interaction approach, the indicator approach, the source apportionment techniques and risk-based metrics, have been developed to estimate total health risk of multi-pollutant exposure (Dominici et al, 2010;Oakes et al, 2014). Despite the progress in characterizing multi-pollutant exposure metrics, the actual interaction among pollutants remains unclear and additional research is needed to quantify the combined effects of multiple pollutants.…”

Characterizing of Air Pollution in Tehran: Comparison of Two Air Quality Indices

“…The most frequently applied index is the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) AQI. The AQI sorts from 0 to 500 and is calculated based on the six criteria pollutants [15,16].…”