2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Chingshui geothermal reservoir in northeast Taiwan with a 3D integrated geophysical visualization model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase tensor parameters gradually show a strong 3D effect between sites 20 and 23 (W -E trend) below T = 10 s, which implies that a conductive anomaly may be located at depth in the area. Thus, the 3D inversion process can potentially delineate an improved electrical model for the Chingshui geothermal area compared with previous studies (Tong et al 2008;Chang et al 2014).…”
Section: Phase Tensor Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The phase tensor parameters gradually show a strong 3D effect between sites 20 and 23 (W -E trend) below T = 10 s, which implies that a conductive anomaly may be located at depth in the area. Thus, the 3D inversion process can potentially delineate an improved electrical model for the Chingshui geothermal area compared with previous studies (Tong et al 2008;Chang et al 2014).…”
Section: Phase Tensor Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The remote reference technique after Gamble et al (1979) was used to improve the data quality. Impedance data for periods > 10 s were removed due to lower data quality as identified by larger error bars and/or scattered data points, as previous papers (Tong et al 2008;Chang et al 2014) did not show the detailed MT responses. We therefore could not compare the difference between old and our reprocessed data.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations