2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.03.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the dynamic retention capacities of microfabricated vapor preconcentrators as a function of flow rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our explanation relies on the desorption temperature values herein used, somewhat hindered by the microfluidic connections capable to withstand maximum temperature of 180ºC. In fact, these values are clearly lower than those commonly reported in the literature for hexane desorption on MFI type zeolites around 300ºC [38]; or even those used on microconcentrators coated with activated carbons, around 225ºC [16][17][18][19]. It could be concluded that the operational performance could be notably improved by using high-temperature microfluidic connections.…”
Section: Standard Characterization Of the Microconcentratorsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our explanation relies on the desorption temperature values herein used, somewhat hindered by the microfluidic connections capable to withstand maximum temperature of 180ºC. In fact, these values are clearly lower than those commonly reported in the literature for hexane desorption on MFI type zeolites around 300ºC [38]; or even those used on microconcentrators coated with activated carbons, around 225ºC [16][17][18][19]. It could be concluded that the operational performance could be notably improved by using high-temperature microfluidic connections.…”
Section: Standard Characterization Of the Microconcentratorsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…From the first portion of the breakthrough curve, i.e. up to C/C 0 =0.05 where the sorption active centers are in clear excess, mass transfer kinetic coefficient of 6184 min -1 has been calculated following the procedure detailed elsewhere [18].…”
Section: Standard Characterization Of the Microconcentratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the common point of all these definitions is its dependence on several parameters such as the sharp and volume of preconcentrator, the adsorption and desorption flows, the pressure drop and the heating rate. Some authors [9,10,11] define the PF as the ratio between peaks area obtained with and without preconcentrator ("chromatography approach"). This approach supposes to have a peak even without preconcentrator, i.e.…”
Section: Definition Of Preconcentration Factor (Pf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental theory of gas adsorption on solid is the first model implemented; it was proposed by Langmuir [9,12,13,14] in 1918 and is based on three key hypotheses:…”
Section: Langmuir Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of our group have reported on a number of μGC and μGC × μGC components and systems in recent years [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] . We have also developed automated prototype instruments containing μGC systems for measuring low-to sub-ppb concentrations of trichloroethylene (TCE) in vapor-intrusion impacted homes 51,52 , and markers of explosives for transportation security 53,54 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%