2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(99)00122-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effective diffusivity of methane in the washcoat of a honeycomb monolith

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the above results that remain true for layer 1 as if they were originally written with the parenthetical superscript, (1) or (2), without further elaboration. For the nondimensionalization of layer 2, we again use an effective thickness, δ (2) =f wc…”
Section: Dual Layers With Coveragesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We use the above results that remain true for layer 1 as if they were originally written with the parenthetical superscript, (1) or (2), without further elaboration. For the nondimensionalization of layer 2, we again use an effective thickness, δ (2) =f wc…”
Section: Dual Layers With Coveragesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/S, but map the second layer to the interval [1,2], adjacent to layer 1. An average quantity for layer 2 is an integral of the quantity from x=1 to 2.…”
Section: Dual Layers With Coveragesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different techniques facing this issue are discussed in a recent work of Kolaczkowski (2003) dealing with measurements of effective diffusivity in catalyst-coated monoliths. In the case of catalytic coatings in flow-through catalysts, typical values for the tortuosity factor range from 1 to 10 (Hayes et al 2000 ).…”
Section: Species Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%