Evaluating the foreign ownership wage premium using a difference-in-differences matching approach

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The Centre for Economic Policy Research was established in 1983 as a private educational charity, to promote independent analysis and public discussion of open economies and the relations among them. It is pluralist and non-partisan, bringing economic research to bear on the analysis of medium-and long-run policy questions. Institutional (core) finance for the Centre has been provided through major grants from the Economic and Social Research Council, under which an ESRC Resource Centre operates within CEPR; the Esmée Fairbairn Charitable Trust; and the Bank of England. These organizations do not give prior review to the Centre's publications, nor do they necessarily endorse the views expressed therein. Terms of use: Documents inThese Discussion Papers often represent preliminary or incomplete work, circulated to encourage discussion and comment. Citation and use of such a paper should take account of its provisional character. ABSTRACTEvaluating the Foreign Ownership Wage Premium Using a Difference-in-Differences Matching Approach* This paper seeks to identify the causal effect of foreign acquisitions on wages of skilled and unskilled workers, using difference-in-differences propensity score matching estimators. Our results suggest that there is substantial heterogeneity in the post-acquisition wage effect depending on the nationality of the foreign acquirer and the skill group of workers. We find sizable post acquisition wage effects on skilled and unskilled wages following an acquisition by a US firm. No such impacts result from acquisitions by EU multinationals. Also we discern some positive wage effects for unskilled workers resulting from acquisitions by multinationals from the rest of the world.JEL Classification: F23 and J31

Performance of domestic and cross-border acquisitions: Empirical evidence from Russian acquirers

“…Moreover, the outcome of the acquisition in subsequent periods will be influenced by previous participation decisions (Caliendo and Kopeinig, 2008). Researchers (e.g., Girma and Gorg, 2007) often simply decide to drop serial acquisitions to overcome this problem. But omitting these firms could lead to a substantial bias in the data analysis (e.g., Ahuja and Katila, 2001) -especially in our case.…”

Firm-level productivity studies: Illusions and a solution

“…Girma and Gorg (2004) and Almeida (2007) review the recent literature on multinationals and provide some new evidence. In a study that has been replicated for other countries, Bernard and Jensen (1999) document the relatively high wages paid by exporters in the United States.…”

Teaching locals new tricks: Foreign experts as a channel of knowledge transfers

“…The second stream of theoretical analysis looks at workers or local firms learning from watching or working for foreign firms with a resulting increase in their productivity (Ethier and Markusen, 1996;Fosfuri et al, 2001;Markusen, 2001;Glass and Saggi, 2002). Empirical work in search of spillovers to local firms include Haddad and Harrison (1993), Aitken et al (1996), Blomstrom and Kokko (1998), Blomström and Sjöholm (1999), Aitken and Harrison (1999), Blalock (2002), Javorcik and Spatareanu (2003), Javorcik (2004), Görg and Strobl (2005), and Girma and Görg (2007). Other empirical literature has documented that local firms and their managers often get their start as employees of multinational firms (Katz, 1987;Hobday, 1995;Hall and Khan, 2003).…”