Evaluating The Implementation of A National COVID-19 Hospital Guideline In Wales

Abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic created a unique situation where a national clinical guideline would address uncertainty, and provide a trusted source for up-to-date information and advice. We developed a dynamic online infrastructure together with a dedicated implementation team to deliver this at scale and pace. The guideline was implemented through a digital implementation framework (SIMPSI framework) deploying facilitators to maximise guideline adoption, particularly targeting senior clinical decision makers (consultants) involved with the care of COVID-infected patients across six Health Boards (HB) in Wales. Methods We evaluated guideline implementation using the Taxonomy of Implementation Outcomes Model. The primary outcome was consultant engagement, with a target of 193 registrations. We assessed wider impact through analysis of guideline platform activity and a user survey, with additional sensitivity analysis to derive penetration ratios, catchment population, clinical staff, acute beds, and COVID-19 admissions. ResultsThe guideline platform had 4521 total registrants, with over 170,000 page views during the first wave. We exceeded the target nearly six-fold (1159 consultant registrants). This represented 45% of all medical consultants in Wales, and made up the highest proportion of guideline registrants of all professional groups (23%, 1159/4521). We observed significant variation in guideline penetration across the six HBs, ranging from 31% to 74% of consultants registered. The HB with highest penetration had the most active guideline facilitator. The HB with the lowest penetration was the region first impacted and most affected by COVID-19 at the time of guideline publication (37% inpatients of peak, versus 10% or less for the other HBs). ConclusionWe utilised a digital implementation framework to construct a system that could be rapidly applied throughout all hospitals in Wales. Whilst we exceeded the intended target demonstrating full implementation, we identified two key factors to account for differences in the penetration rates across the different HBs. First, an experienced and active facilitator with the capacity to undertake the role was associated with significantly better penetration. Second, timeliness of implementation was crucial as evidenced by lower penetrance is the one HB that was impacted earliest by COVID-19 at the time of guideline dissemination. Nevertheless, the rapid implementation of the guideline has coincided with Wales demonstrating more favourable intensive care survival rates and maintaining one of the lowest mortality rates when compared to the UK as a whole for the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Outcomes from a national screening program for Ukrainian refugees at risk of drug resistant tuberculosis in Wales

“…All TB teams attended a webinar on the pathway which was also disseminated to primary care through a digital framework as previously described. 9 The guideline was changed on 5 August to only screen children under 11 who were symptomatic or close contacts of active TB cases.…”

“…7 Wales implemented a more comprehensive screening programme utilising a digital implementation framework, 8 which has been used successfully to implement a national COVID-19 guideline. 9 …”