2016
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/47/1/012018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the performance of Lyzenga's water column correction in case-1 coral reef water using a simulated Wolrdview-2 imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluating the results of water-column corrections has not yet been a prominent area of research, though some work has evaluated individual models [15,269,276,277]. For example, O'Neill and Costa [15] compared the water-column corrected spectra achieved through algorithmic manipulation to the "true" measurements of the substrates laid out on a dry, black background.…”
Section: Corrections Specific To Aquatic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating the results of water-column corrections has not yet been a prominent area of research, though some work has evaluated individual models [15,269,276,277]. For example, O'Neill and Costa [15] compared the water-column corrected spectra achieved through algorithmic manipulation to the "true" measurements of the substrates laid out on a dry, black background.…”
Section: Corrections Specific To Aquatic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be stressed that this discussion assumes clear waters, with a negligible water leaving reflectance over optically deep waters in the RED-NIR-SWIR range of the solar spectrum, although significant progress in underway to accommodate less favorable water quality conditions [ 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyzenga's water column correction algorithm is used to identify coral reefs. The best option to be applied in the area with a lack of water optical data is Lyzenga's method [6]. Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%