Evaluating the ready biodegradability of two poorly water-soluble substances: comparative approach of bioavailability improvement methods (BIMs)

Abstract

Difficulties encountered in estimating the biodegradation of poorly water-soluble substances are often linked to their limited bioavailability to microorganisms. Many original bioavailability improvement methods (BIMs) have been described, but no global approach was proposed for a standardized comparison of these. The latter would be a valuable tool as part of a wider strategy for evaluating poorly water-soluble substances. The purpose of this study was to define an evaluation strategy following the assessment of different BIMs adapted to poorly water-soluble substances with ready biodegradability tests. The study was performed with two poorly water-soluble chemicals—a solid, anthraquinone, and a liquid, isodecyl neopentanoate—and five BIMs were compared to the direct addition method (reference method), i.e., (i) ultrasonic dispersion, (ii) adsorption onto silica gel, (iii) dispersion using an emulsifier, (iv) dispersion with silicone oil, and (v) dispersion with emulsifier and silicone oil. A two-phase evaluation strategy of solid and liquid chemicals was developed involving the selection of the most relevant BIMs for enhancing the biodegradability of tested substances. A description is given of a BIM classification ratio (RBIM), which enables a comparison to be made between the different test chemical sample preparation methods used in the various tests. Thereby, using this comparison, the BIMs giving rise to the greatest biodegradability were ultrasonic dispersion and dispersion with silicone oil or with silicone oil and emulsifier for the tested solid chemical, adsorption onto silica gel, and ultrasonic dispersion for the liquid one.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6899-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Biodegradability study of active chitosan biopolymer films enriched with Quercus polyphenol extract in different soil types

“…On the other hand, low solubility is often linked to low biodegradability (Sweetlove et al, 2016). Both chitosan-based films exhibit TSM: 23 ± 4% and 24 ± 1% for CH and CHQ, respectively, while conventional petroleum-based plastics such as LDPE does not swell in water and is insoluble (Vasile and Pascu, 2005).…”

Systematic Model-Based Methodology for Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals

“…Also, there are chemicals that show poor solubility in water or are unstable at high temperatures. For such chemicals it is difficult to perform experiments and assess their EH&S properties 26 .…”

“…Therefore, methylene chloride is required to be substituted due to its acute inhalation toxicity (Task 1). Apart from consumers, formulators are also exposed to the vapor inhalation during mixing/blending operations and hence in the US, the ban of methylene chloride-containing paint strippers has also been a subject of discussion recently [26][27] .…”

“…For such chemicals it is difficult to perform experiments and assess their EH&S properties. 26 Considering these reasons, we have recognized the need for a model-based methodology for chemical substitution that could help enhance existing alternatives assessment frameworks. A substitution methodology, which can identify and generate promising substitute candidates through both database search and model-based techniques, check their economic feasibility, and only then make use of experiments to verify and test their compatibility and applicability, has been developed in this work.…”

Removal of Calcium Carbonate Water-Based Filter Cake Using a Green Biodegradable Acid

“…The acid formulation was sent to an accredited laboratory to measure the acid biodegradability using the OECD 301B biodegradation test. This is an aerobic biodegradation test where a material is introduced to an inoculum in a closed environment and the biodegradability of the acid is measured by carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) evolution 28 days later [32][33][34].…”