2014
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2014.925922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Use of Spatial Covariance Structures in the Analysis of Cardiovascular Imaging Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phrase cardiac imaging covers a wide variety of medical applications, from perfusion of oxygenated blood [Bowman and Waller (2004)] to the mechanical properties of the myocardium [Seals et al (2014)] to the structure of the left ventricle (as in Figure 1) that we will consider in this paper. Most analyses of the left ventricle via cardiac MRI scans in recent years have been based on the spatial model proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) [Cerqueria et al (2002)].…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phrase cardiac imaging covers a wide variety of medical applications, from perfusion of oxygenated blood [Bowman and Waller (2004)] to the mechanical properties of the myocardium [Seals et al (2014)] to the structure of the left ventricle (as in Figure 1) that we will consider in this paper. Most analyses of the left ventricle via cardiac MRI scans in recent years have been based on the spatial model proposed by the American Heart Association (AHA) [Cerqueria et al (2002)].…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also means that there is not as much unique information among the segments, so not as much actual information is lost in the summarization. Last, there have only been a small number of studies [Bowman and Waller (2004), Seals et al (2014)] that have looked to introduce spatial analysis to cardiac imaging data, so it has not yet become the standard research approach in the field.…”
Section: Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation