2005
DOI: 10.1375/1832427054936664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Whole Genome Amplification via Multiply-Primed Rolling Circle Amplification for SNP Genotyping of Samples With Low DNA Yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these analyses, one sample was found to be contaminated and was excluded. DNA samples with low DNA yield (<7.5 µg of genomic DNA) as measured by fluorescent label PicoGreen (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were subjected to whole genome amplification before genotyping, followed by additional quality control checks [36]. A total of five samples were excluded due to biased whole genome amplification, and a further 4 samples were excluded due to extremely low quantities of DNA which was insufficient for whole genome amplification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In these analyses, one sample was found to be contaminated and was excluded. DNA samples with low DNA yield (<7.5 µg of genomic DNA) as measured by fluorescent label PicoGreen (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were subjected to whole genome amplification before genotyping, followed by additional quality control checks [36]. A total of five samples were excluded due to biased whole genome amplification, and a further 4 samples were excluded due to extremely low quantities of DNA which was insufficient for whole genome amplification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 5.5% of the genotypes were created with an in-house developed method of allele-specific primer extension on microarrays, as previously described [36]. Approximately 93.0% of the genotypes were produced with the MassARRAY System (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA), either with the homogeneous Mass Extension (hME) reaction or iPLEX reaction, using the protocols recommended by the manufacturer with these modifications: hME reactions were carried out with 5–7.5 ng of DNA and for the majority of the variants, the hME extension reaction was run using TERMIPol DNA polymerase (Solis Biodyne OÜ, Tartu, Estonia) [42] instead of ThermoSequenase (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont St. Giles, UK).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genotyping was done with homogeneous mass extension using the MassARRAY System (Sequenom, San Diego, California) in multiplexes of two to six SNPs. The COMT variants were genotyped by microarray-based allele-specific primer extension method (12). Genotyping was performed in two phases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity of DNA was validated using PicoGreen (Invitrogen (Molecular Probes), Carlsbad, USA) Xuorescent label prior to aliquotting. Samples with low yield of DNA were ampliWed with GenomePhi [GE Healthcare (Amersham Biotech), Chalfont, St Giles, UK] whole genome ampliWcation kit as previously described (Silander et al 2005).…”
Section: Biochemical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%