2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation analysis of prediction methods for two-phase flow pressure drop in mini-channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquid film thickness was calculated based on annular two phase flow models. Three models were used, including the modified Chisholm, [20][21][22] Turner-Walis, [23][24][25][26] and Fourar-Lenormand. [27] Adv.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/admi201600025mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid film thickness was calculated based on annular two phase flow models. Three models were used, including the modified Chisholm, [20][21][22] Turner-Walis, [23][24][25][26] and Fourar-Lenormand. [27] Adv.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/admi201600025mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were significant differences between the values obtained. The study by Sun and Mishima [16] also gives different versions of correlations, while there is no clear indication of a correlation being particularly recommended for R134a and all the more for other new refrigerants. For this reason, the authors conducted their own experimental tests in this area.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several good reviews are provided by Sun and Mishima [9], Asadi et al [10], and Kim and Mudawar [11] for mini-and microchannel flow. Kim and Mudawar published a universal correlation for a wide range of fluids, flow rates, and channel shapes, constructed from over 7000 data points compiled from 36 studies.…”
Section: Eqmentioning
confidence: 99%