2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and characterization of starch nanoparticles for adsorption of urea from dialysates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of uptake was performed at treatment temperatures of 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C, utilizing an initial urea concentration of 150 mg/L, throughout a time frame of adsorption saturation 36 . The effect of pH on the adsorption performance was investigated at 25 °C, 150 mg/L and saturated adsorption, and the pH was adjusted by using diluted solutions of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH 37 . All experiments were conducted in three sets of parallel experiments under identical conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of uptake was performed at treatment temperatures of 20, 25, 30, and 35 °C, utilizing an initial urea concentration of 150 mg/L, throughout a time frame of adsorption saturation 36 . The effect of pH on the adsorption performance was investigated at 25 °C, 150 mg/L and saturated adsorption, and the pH was adjusted by using diluted solutions of 0.1 M HCl or 0.1 M NaOH 37 . All experiments were conducted in three sets of parallel experiments under identical conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the adsorption temperature of 25, 30, 35, and 40 °C and the initial concentration of urea of 150 mg/L for 6 h, the solution was removed and filtered to calculate the adsorption capacity. The pH was modified using either a dilute solution of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) or 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) . Three parallel experiments were conducted under the same conditions to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%