2021 IEEE 3rd Global Conference on Life Sciences and Technologies (LifeTech) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/lifetech52111.2021.9391953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Method of Rheumatoid Arthritis by the X-ray Photograph using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of wrist joints with progressive destruction is a particularly challenging task,[3] and most reports on AI scoring models are limited to finger score predictions. [4,22,23] ResNet34, used in a previous report,[2] could not achieve highly accurate detection in our hand images, possibly because our dataset contains more severe joint destruction. In addition, a CNN that directly regresses landmarks, such as joint coordinates, is considered a model that performs a highly nonlinear transformation from images to coordinates; thus, accurately estimating coordinates is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of wrist joints with progressive destruction is a particularly challenging task,[3] and most reports on AI scoring models are limited to finger score predictions. [4,22,23] ResNet34, used in a previous report,[2] could not achieve highly accurate detection in our hand images, possibly because our dataset contains more severe joint destruction. In addition, a CNN that directly regresses landmarks, such as joint coordinates, is considered a model that performs a highly nonlinear transformation from images to coordinates; thus, accurately estimating coordinates is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several CNN-based scoring systems have been reported for joint destruction in RA. [2][3][4] However, to the best of our knowledge, automated scoring systems applicable to clinical or research settings have not been constructed owing to the following reasons. First, the previous image dataset in RA was mostly dominated by intact joint images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our literature review, we found that many scholars encountered the problem of an insufficient sample size [ 7 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 19 ]. Our method explored the feasibility by standardizing data annotation files to reduce the computing power requirements for the CNN model and improve the positioning accuracy with fewer than 1000 images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used 50 X-ray images of RA and diagnostic markers of finger joints to train and validate YOLOv3 to evaluate each of the diagnostic markers. The Sharp/van der Heijde score index of finger joint surface reduction and erosion was employed to categorize the 50 images; the prediction accuracy of each category reached approximately 80% on average, which verified the applicability of the DL technology in RA diagnosis [ 19 ]. However, they did not explicitly mention the data of commonly used evaluation indicators for object detection algorithms, such as the mean average precision (mAP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In rheumatology, and more specifically, in the scope of RA, several deep learning researchers over the past years have presented their work as they tried to achieve a method for automatic classification of medical images for RA diagnosis. According to [10], it is very difficult for a doctor not majored in RA to evaluate precisely the condition of RA as its diagnosis is affiliated with implicit knowledge. The authors in [11] also agree that physicians have to rely on a manual and subjective examination of radiographs.…”
Section: Deep Learning On Ramentioning
confidence: 99%