2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2016.7745171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation methods for user-centered child-robot interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Robotic technology for children can affect the way children develop. Robots are becoming part of children's care, education, entertainment, social assistance and therapy holding promises to support children's development in novel ways [1,2,3,5]. However, research has shown that technologies that do not take into account children's needs, abilities, interests, and developmental characteristics may have limited and sometimes even a negative impact on their physical, cognitive, social, emotional, and moral development.…”
Section: Overview Of the Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robotic technology for children can affect the way children develop. Robots are becoming part of children's care, education, entertainment, social assistance and therapy holding promises to support children's development in novel ways [1,2,3,5]. However, research has shown that technologies that do not take into account children's needs, abilities, interests, and developmental characteristics may have limited and sometimes even a negative impact on their physical, cognitive, social, emotional, and moral development.…”
Section: Overview Of the Workhopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review on educational robots found 101 papers with 309 study results [2], but a survey on only longitudinal interactions [24] reported a mere 8 studies. We discuss an additional 6 studies, but in a review on evaluation methods we also observed a substantial lack of long term studies, among other things related to practical challenges in long term classroom research and the technological readiness of robotic systems [6]. The paucity of long term studies is a real problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-6746-2/20/03. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374803 stay relevant and engaging over time [6]. To understand the exact design parameters it is important to gain insight into how children interact with HRI systems, day-to-day in their own classrooms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the majority of the existing research in the field of child-robot interaction refers to studies with imposed canonical robot interventions which do not allow children to develop their exploratory skills and exhibit self-initiated voluntary interaction. In addition to this, most of the existing work focuses only on the learning outcomes (Charisi et al, 2016 ) without examining the development of learning process as it occurs and the emergence of possible patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%