2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a community-based food waste campaign using a national control group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several prior studies reported successful behavioral interventions related to food waste (e.g. Shu et al ., 2023; van Dooren et al. , 2020; Shearer et al.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several prior studies reported successful behavioral interventions related to food waste (e.g. Shu et al ., 2023; van Dooren et al. , 2020; Shearer et al.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prior studies reported successful behavioral interventions related to food waste (e.g. Shu et al, 2023;van Dooren et al, 2020;Shearer et al, 2017). These studies focused on educating participants or facilitating a behavior rather than changing it to a new one, which might explain why their interventions were effective.…”
Section: The Behavioral Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of planned behaviour is a prominent foundation for intervention design [45,76], cited in nine of the sixteen articles. Other theories used were wider pro-environmental behaviour research [51,52], the motivation opportunity ability framework [47,54], and self-affirmation theory [49]. Similarly, but offering a different perspective, social influence theory [58] and social practice theory [33,50] were drawn on to incorporate social norms and influences on participant behaviour.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories purport that behaviours are influenced by the people and environment around us, not undertaken in isolation [23,77]. Two studies provided no theoretical basis to inform its design [53,54].…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey builds upon a validated online survey ( van Herpen, van Geffen, et al, 2019) as adapted and validated for US audiences (Shu et al, 2021) in which respondents are first directed to monitor discarded food over the next 7 days and then administered a survey a week later where respondents report waste from the previous week in 24 distinct categories. While self-reports of food waste yield estimated levels that are substantially (~40%) less than direct physical measurement of household food waste streams (Hoover & Moreno, 2017;van Herpen, van der Lans, et al, 2019;WRAP, 2020), this approach is effective at tracking changes in waste and identifying differences between subgroups of households with well-known variations in food waste levels (van Herpen, van der Lans, et al, 2019;Shu et al, 2023Shu et al, , 2021WRAP 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%