“…Among these, 193 were evaluated based on their titles and abstracts, which lead to an independent full-text review of 85 publications by two investigators. Following further screening based on predefined criteria, 56 publications were excluded, leaving 29 studies for qualitative synthesis ( Ma et al, 2014 , Ganga et al, 2017 , Sharma et al, 2022 , Neumann et al, 2022 , Nazir and Monalisa, 2020 , Morikawa et al, 2020 , Jayasinghe et al, 2020 , Bayad et al, 2019 , Johnson et al, 2019 , Chiang et al, 2019 , Deuerling et al, 2019 , Shi et al, 2019 , Bagga et al, 2017 , Popa et al, 2017 , Baeten et al, 2017 ; Yamamoto et al, 2017 , Lalla et al, 2016 , Kaur and Handa, 2016 , Nanayakkara et al, 2016 , Sawan and Mashlah, 2015 , Trakroo et al, 2015 , Awan et al, 2015 , Singh and Shukla, 2015 , Petruzzi et al, 2014 , Gupta et al, 2014 , Casparis et al, 2014 , Vashisht et al, 2014 , Suyambukesan et al, 2014 ). Inter-examiner reliability assessments for title/abstract screening and full-text evaluation resulted in kappa scores of 0.84 and 0.90, respectively, and any discrepancies were resolved with the involvement of a third reviewer.…”