1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4168(19980601)21:6<347::aid-jhrc347>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Semi-Automated Multidimensional Gas Chromatography-Infrared-Mass Spectrometry System for Irritant Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with GC retention indices, a more informative conclusion as well as more confidence in the ultimate identification can be obtained. A typical hyphenation can be achieved by performing conventional GC or MDGC followed by post-column splitting at a suitable ratio (e.g., 10% v/v of the effluent to MS and the rest to FTIR [70]), prior to the synchronised detection with both MS and FTIR. One obvious advantage of the hyphenation of MS and FTIR is to avoid the ambiguity regarding which mass spectrum corresponds to which infrared spectrum, provided the respective compound is located in the MS or FTIR at the appropriate time; MDGC should assist to assuring this.…”
Section: Insert Figure 6 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with GC retention indices, a more informative conclusion as well as more confidence in the ultimate identification can be obtained. A typical hyphenation can be achieved by performing conventional GC or MDGC followed by post-column splitting at a suitable ratio (e.g., 10% v/v of the effluent to MS and the rest to FTIR [70]), prior to the synchronised detection with both MS and FTIR. One obvious advantage of the hyphenation of MS and FTIR is to avoid the ambiguity regarding which mass spectrum corresponds to which infrared spectrum, provided the respective compound is located in the MS or FTIR at the appropriate time; MDGC should assist to assuring this.…”
Section: Insert Figure 6 Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isomer identification [58] GC-FTIR Designer drugs Complimentary structural elucidation to GC-MS analysis [48] MDGC-FTIR-MS Fragrances Irritant identification using spectral library identification [234] GC-…”
Section: Gc-ftir Alcoholic Beveragesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also be achieved by using two identical columns, switching between two detectors with an open cross splitter, or running the effluent stream through serially linked detectors [234]. Employing cryogenic IR methods are useful to minimise sensitivity differences between the two detectors, but is not amenable to on-line methods.…”
Section: Gc×gc-fpd(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS is a favored technique to be operated in parallel with FTIR to provide complementary information of both molecular/fragment ion m / z data and spectroscopic vibrations/functional groups of the studied compounds. , Combined with GC retention index ( I ) data, , improved certainty and confidence in the identification of components have been proposed. Typical parallel detection can be achieved by performing conventional GC followed by postcolumn splitting in a suitable ratio (e.g., 90% v/v of the effluent to FTIR and the rest to MS), reported for a multidimensional GC experiment that improves isolation of individual compounds, with synchronized detection of both MS and FTIR channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%