“…This variation can, at least partly, be explained by differences in clinical staging, prevalence of nodal involvement, time between operation and performance of the scan and criteria for evaluation of the test (18,21,22). Our prevalence of 13.7% was higher than reported by most authors (1,8,14,17,21), which can be explained by our definition of a positive scan. Wide criteria for definition of a positive scan cause a high rate of false positive tests.…”