3rd International Power Electronic Congress. Technical Proceedings. CIEP '94
DOI: 10.1109/ciep.1994.494399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of boost, Sepic and Cuk topologies as power factor correction stage in electronic ballast applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the circuit schematic of Cúk converter shown in Fig. 1, inductors L 1 and L 2 are assumed sufficiently large so that the converter will not enter DICM or DQRM [5]. For operating in DCVM, it is also assumed that the capacitor is sufficiently small so that it is fully discharged in a fraction of the switching cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the circuit schematic of Cúk converter shown in Fig. 1, inductors L 1 and L 2 are assumed sufficiently large so that the converter will not enter DICM or DQRM [5]. For operating in DCVM, it is also assumed that the capacitor is sufficiently small so that it is fully discharged in a fraction of the switching cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the classic converters used for this application is the Cúk converter. Compared to buck-based and boost-based structures, the Cúk converter has several advantages such as continuous and low ripple input and output currents and wide range of output voltage [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To satisfy the forthcoming harmonic standards, such as IEC 1000-3-2, PFC's serving as front-end converters have been attracting more and more attention. Among various PFC topologies, the Cúk PFC is deemed desirable for its continuous input and output currents, ripple-free input current, small output filter, and wide output voltage range [9]- [10]. However, the switch utilization factor of the Cúk topology is much lower than other topologies, such as the buck topology and the boost topology [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%