2019
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Deep Learning Strategies for Nucleus Segmentation in Fluorescence Images

Abstract: Identifying nuclei is often a critical first step in analyzing microscopy images of cells and classical image processing algorithms are most commonly used for this task. Recent developments in deep learning can yield superior accuracy, but typical evaluation metrics for nucleus segmentation do not satisfactorily capture error modes that are relevant in cellular images. We present an evaluation framework to measure accuracy, types of errors, and computational efficiency; and use it to compare deep learning stra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
230
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
230
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two other methods employed extend this process by attempting to further identify individual cells within spheroids. The first of these uses the U-Net-based nuclei segmentation model of CellProfiler (Caicedo et al 2019) via Cytokit (Czech et al 2018) while the second utilizes a custom cytometry function based on differences of gaussian filters. This second method affords greater flexibility in parameterization to aid in tuning thresholds (albeit subjectively) to better capture nuclei images with noisy, occluded boundaries.…”
Section: Culture Cytotoxicity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two other methods employed extend this process by attempting to further identify individual cells within spheroids. The first of these uses the U-Net-based nuclei segmentation model of CellProfiler (Caicedo et al 2019) via Cytokit (Czech et al 2018) while the second utilizes a custom cytometry function based on differences of gaussian filters. This second method affords greater flexibility in parameterization to aid in tuning thresholds (albeit subjectively) to better capture nuclei images with noisy, occluded boundaries.…”
Section: Culture Cytotoxicity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, deep learning (DL) methods have proven themselves worthy of consideration in microscopy image analysis tools as they have also been successfully applied in a wider range of applications including but not limited to face detection (Taigman et al, 2014, Sun et al 2014, Schroff et al 2015, self-driving cars (Badrinarayanan et al, 2017, Redmon et al, 2016, Grigorescu et al, 2019 and speech recognition (Hinton et al, 2012). Caicedo et al (Caicedo et al, 2019) and others (Hollandi et al 2019, Moshkov et al 2019 proved that single cell detection and segmentation accuracy can be significantly improved utilizing DL networks. The most popular and widely used deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) include Mask R-CNN (He et al, 2017): an object detection and instance segmentation network, YOLO (Redmon et al, 2016): a fast object detector and U-Net (Ronneberger et al, 2015): a semantic segmentation approach specifically intended for bioimage analysis purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U-Net itself is 50 commonly used in machine learning approaches because it is a lightweight convolutional neural 51 network (CNN) which readily captures information at multiple spatial scales within an image, 52 thereby preserving reconstruction accuracy while reducing the required number of training 53 samples and training time. U-Nets, and related deep learning approaches, have found broad 54 application to live-cell imaging tasks such as cell phenotype classification, feature 55 segmentation 10, [14][15][16][17][18][19] , and histological stain analysis [20][21][22][23] . 56 57…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%