2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Dimensional Stability, Accuracy and Surface Hardness of Interocclusal Recording Materials at Various Time Intervals: An In Vitro Study

Abstract: To evaluate and compare the dimensional stability, accuracy and surface hardness of three interocclusal recording materials at various time intervals. Polyvinylsiloxane, Zinc oxide eugenol, Aluwax were taken for this study. A stainless steel die of ADA specification no 19. was prepared. A total of ten samples were made with each group. The samples were measured using a travelling microscope of 10× magnification at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h time intervals. Five readings were taken for each sample, the mean was conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest setting shrinkage strain showed O-Bite (polyvinylsiloxane-based material): 0.18 ± 0.03–0.16 ± 0.03% at 5, 7, and 10 min, followed by polyether-based material, whereas dimethacrylate-based material had the highest degree of shrinkage. In the study of Anup et al, dimensional change and accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane bite registration material were also statistically significant but clinically insignificant [ 6 ]. Campos and Nathanson [ 5 ] examined the compressibility of two addition silicones interocclusal record materials, analyzing the changes of maxillomandibular relations at the condyle region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest setting shrinkage strain showed O-Bite (polyvinylsiloxane-based material): 0.18 ± 0.03–0.16 ± 0.03% at 5, 7, and 10 min, followed by polyether-based material, whereas dimethacrylate-based material had the highest degree of shrinkage. In the study of Anup et al, dimensional change and accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane bite registration material were also statistically significant but clinically insignificant [ 6 ]. Campos and Nathanson [ 5 ] examined the compressibility of two addition silicones interocclusal record materials, analyzing the changes of maxillomandibular relations at the condyle region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, polyether and polyvinyl siloxane bite recording materials are increasing in popularity due to their handling characteristics, accuracy, and dimensional stability [ 2 , 6 , 12 , 13 ]. These materials are very similar to dental impression materials, but their properties following modifications via the addition of plasticizers and catalysts are unknown [ 2 , 6 , 7 ]. They do not require a carrier and are cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] Anup et al in a study stated that, among all materials tested, polyvinyl siloxane showed more accuracy, at different time intervals followed by zinc oxide eugenol and Aluwax, respectively. [16]…”
Section: Siliconesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerous studies have been made on the accuracy and stability of impression,[ 5 6 ] few studies on the dimensional stability of different interocclusal recording materials have been investigated[ 7 8 9 10 ] but the effect of disinfection and its method on the dimensional accuracy of interocclusal recording materials have not been reported previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%