2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment of erosion protection as one ecosystem service in the studies has often been based on potential soil loss calculations with the USLE (García-Nieto et al 2013) or RUSLE models (Anaya-Romero et al 2016), or on the general assumption that dense forest on steep slopes > 30% supplies this service (Roces-Díaz et al 2018). The role of forest providing this service on steep slopes is certainly important although the risk of soil erosion is high even under forest cover due to orographic and climatic reasons.…”
Section: No Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of erosion protection as one ecosystem service in the studies has often been based on potential soil loss calculations with the USLE (García-Nieto et al 2013) or RUSLE models (Anaya-Romero et al 2016), or on the general assumption that dense forest on steep slopes > 30% supplies this service (Roces-Díaz et al 2018). The role of forest providing this service on steep slopes is certainly important although the risk of soil erosion is high even under forest cover due to orographic and climatic reasons.…”
Section: No Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study, carried out on a large sample of FMUs representative of pure cork oak stands with composite structure in Sardinia, contributes to the ongoing debate on interactions and synergies between goods and services associated with the management of Mediterranean forests (Mavsar et al 2014). Few studies (Campos et al 2009, Ovando et al 2010, Bugalho et al 2011, Anaya-Romero et al 2016 can be found in literature specifically with regard to valuation of ecosystem production from cork oak forests, and none, at least to our knowledge, has investigated the effects of iForest 11: 660-667 664 Fig. 3 -Map of the economic values of total annual production of the considered goods and services in selected pure cork oak forest management units in Sardinia, under current conditions and simulated management scenarios: (i) OLDS, theoretical silvicultural option with reference to 350 trees ha -1 ; (ii) OHDS, theoretical silvicultural option with reference to 800 trees ha -1 ; (iii) CLDS, realistic silvicultural option with reference to 350 trees ha -1 ; (iv) CHDS, realistic silvicultural option with reference to 800 trees ha -1 (see text for explanation; coordinate system: GCS_International 1909 -Hayford).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bugalho et al (2011Bugalho et al ( , 2016 described cork oak savanna-related payment for ecosystem services mechanisms and identified areas for maximizing such services, but did not deal with valuation at the level of forest management unit, as this study has done. Similarly, Anaya-Romero et al (2016) provided an estimation of ecosystem production in south Spain at the large-scale level of the socalled eco-management units. On the other hand, Ovando et al (2010) dealt mainly with the estimation of the private net benefits from new afforestation on marginal shrubland and cropland with cork oaks in Spain, while the analyses from Campos et al (2007) focused on total income supplied by cork oak woodland activities in Tunisia, not taking into account unmarketed services (e.g., carbon sequestration) like this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, assessment of soil protection ES is based on potential soil loss calculation using the USLE (e.g. García-Nieto et al 2013) or RUSLE model (Anaya-Romero et al 2016).…”
Section: Risk Assessment and Forest Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%