2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.04.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Intraplaque Neovascularization Using Superb Microvascular Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging of IP neovascularization is possible in human plaques using microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography [13][14][15][16], though this approach is not feasible (or at least unlikely) in mouse plaques due to the extremely small size of the IP neovessels. Hitherto, immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded sections remains the only method for evaluating IP angio-genesis in mouse plaques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging of IP neovascularization is possible in human plaques using microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography [13][14][15][16], though this approach is not feasible (or at least unlikely) in mouse plaques due to the extremely small size of the IP neovessels. Hitherto, immunohistochemical analysis of paraffin-embedded sections remains the only method for evaluating IP angio-genesis in mouse plaques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This promotes plaque instability and represents an important source of free cholesterol from red blood cells membranes, with consequent macrophage infiltration and necrotic core enlargement [10,11]. CEUS and SMI have shown great promise in the visualization of intraplaque neovascularization [12,14,[30][31][32][33][34][35], and studies have reported good correlation between IPN assessment by CEUS and micro-vessel density at histology [12,36]. Previous studies also demonstrated a good consistency between assessment of IPN by CEUS and SMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time necessary to observe neovascularization was much shorter for SMI than for CEUS, and the ability to use a conventional abdominal transducer to detect plaques located at a high position perfectly met the needs of the clinical examination. Another study revealed 100% specificity for SMI and sensitivity of 63% in the detection of intraplaque blood flow in carotid plaques (Figure ) . However, because these studies had a small sample size, and the reported studies were relatively limited, we think that multicenter clinical studies including more patients are needed in the future to verify the effectiveness of SMI in evaluating neovascularization in carotid plaques.…”
Section: Superb Microvascular Imaging For Evaluating Neovascularizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C and D , Sagittal and axial CEUS imaging of the plaque. The arrows mark the blood flow signal (reprinted with permission from Oura et al).…”
Section: Superb Microvascular Imaging For Evaluating Neovascularizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation