Evaluation of Learning Programs at Elementary School Level of “Sekolah Alam Indonesia (SAI)”. (Evaluative Research Using Countenance Stake’s Model)

Harjanti, Rina; Supriyati, Yetti; Rahayu, Wardani

doi:10.12691/education-7-2-2

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evaluation is used to answer various questions about the program being evaluated [17]. Questions on the assessment instrument were taken from the online learning process quality assurance manual issued by the Directorate of Learning and Student Affairs of the Ministry of Education and Culture [16] so that the assessment instrument questions were considered valid so that no validity and reliability tests were conducted on the instrument question.…”

Section: Questionnaire Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Application of Online Learning in Indonesian Universities

Setiawan¹,

Munajah²

2020

TEM Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a quality assurance manual for online learning processes that can be used by all universities in Indonesia to evaluate the results of implementing online learning lectures that have been implemented in each college. There are 4 assessment categories in this research. Average interpretation value of the evaluation of the application of learning at Trilogi University had a percentage of 75.69% which indicated that it had gone well, but it was necessary to improve the learning assistance service instrument because the results of the study showed percentage of 69.87%.

show abstract

Section: Questionnaire Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Application of Online Learning in Indonesian Universities

Setiawan¹,

Munajah²

2020

TEM Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several theories reveal that the Countenance model has two evaluation matrixes, including a description matrix and a judgment matrix (Gondikit, 2018; Harjanti et al, 2019; Ismail et al, 2018). The description matrix is used to reveal data related to the existence of the object being evaluated, while the judgment matrix is used to reveal data related to evaluation standards and the verification results of conformity between evaluation standards and data from evaluation results in the field (Dewantara, 2017; Zainuddin & Fuad, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualitative Data Requirements in the Divayana Evaluation Model

Divayana

Widiartini

Ratnaya

2022

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need for qualitative data to support the evaluation process using the DIVAYANA (Description-Input-Verification-Action-Yack-Analysis-Nominate-Actualization) evaluation model is very important to obtain in-depth information about the effectiveness of e-learning platform utilization in ICT Vocational Schools. Those qualitative data are used to complete the evaluation process for the eight components of the DIVAYANA evaluation model. The eight components included Description component, Input component, Verification component, Action component, Yack component, Analysis component, Nominate component, and Actualization component. The main purpose of this study was to show the qualitative data needed in each evaluation component of the DIVAYANA evaluation model. The tools used to obtain qualitative data on the eight components of the DIVAYANA evaluation model were interview guidelines, checklists, and literature studies. This study approach was qualitative. The technique used to test the qualitative data validity in this study was theoretical triangulation. The findings of this study were the qualitative data needed in each component of the DIVAYANA evaluation model to show the effectiveness of e-learning platform utilization in ICT Vocational Schools. The findings of this study have a positive contribution to the evaluation process in the field of education, especially in strengthening the correctness of the quantitative data results which are usually obtained in the evaluation process. The novelty of this study is the presentation of qualitative data on the yack component, analysis component, and nominate component which does not have by other evaluation models.

show abstract

“…In qualitative research the researcher acts as a key instrument, but when collecting data observation sheets, interview sheets, and various documents related to the field practicum program are used to assist researchers in collecting data. This evaluation model places importance on the results of observations, descriptions, and program evaluations through various data sources and data analysis between stakeholders and evaluators (Harjanti et al, 2019). The collected data is then analyzed using techniques namely condensing data, displaying data, and making conclusions or verifying data (Miles et al, 2016).…”

Section: B Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of local potential-based local marine biology field practicum program

Sam

Nursia²,

Burhanuddin³

2023

bino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marine biology field practicum based on local potential is routinely held at the Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Borneo Tarakan, but has never been evaluated. This study aims to analyze the implementation and results of the field practicum that has been carried out, and make decisions so that the quality of the process and output of the practicum can be increased. This research is an evaluation research using countenance stake model which is qualitative in nature. The unit of analysis used is the course lecturer, students, field assistants, head of the laboratory, study program curriculum, lesson plans, infrastructure, tools and materials, practicum guides, and practicum reports. The techniques used are observation, interviews and document analysis. Data were analyzed using data condensation techniques, data presentation, and data verification. The results of this study are: 1) the planning stage is of poor quality, 2) the process (transaction) stage is of good quality, and 3) the product (outcomes) stage is of excellent quality. The team of lecturers supporting the course needs to plan practicums more carefully as an effort to improve, such as revising the RPS, compiling practicum guidelines based on local potential, compiling assessment instruments and coordinating well with the head of the laboratory regarding the practicum implementation.AbstrakPraktikum lapangan biologi laut berbasis potensi lokal rutin dilaksanakan pada jurusan Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Borneo Tarakan, namun belum pernah dievaluasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan dan hasil praktikum lapangan yang telah dilaksanakan, dan membuat keputusan agar kualitas proses dan keluaran praktikum dapat meningkat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian evaluasi menggunakan model countenance stake yang bersifat kualitatif. Unit analisis yang digunakan adalah Dosen Pengampuh mata kuliah, Mahasiswa, Pembantu Lapang, Kepala Laboratorium, kurikulum prodi, RPS, sarana prasarana, alat dan bahan, panduan praktikum, dan laporan praktikum. Teknik yang digunakan yaitu observasi, wawancara dan analisis dokumen. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik kondensasi data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi data. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu: 1) tahap perencanaan berada pada kualitas kurang baik, 2) tahap proses (transaction) berada pada kualitas baik, dan 3) tahap produk (outcomes) berada pada kualitas sangat baik. Tim Dosen pengampuh mata kuliah perlu merencanakan praktikum dengan lebih matang sebagai upaya perbaikan, seperti merevisi RPS, menyusun panduan praktikum berbasis potensi lokal, menyusun instrumen penilaian dan melakukan koordinasi yang baik dengan kepala laboratorium terkait pelaksanaan praktikum.

show abstract

Evaluation of Learning Programs at Elementary School Level of “Sekolah Alam Indonesia (SAI)”. (Evaluative Research Using Countenance Stake’s Model)

Cited by 12 publications

References 10 publications

Evaluation of the Application of Online Learning in Indonesian Universities

Evaluation of the Application of Online Learning in Indonesian Universities

Qualitative Data Requirements in the Divayana Evaluation Model

Evaluation of local potential-based local marine biology field practicum program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About