Evaluation of marine spatial planning

Carneiro, Gonçalo

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.003

Cited by 57 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Even though the precise definition of marine spatial planning is never into certain agreement (Gopnik et al, 2012), it is clear that from the definitions, the marine spatial planning is aiming for the sustainable development of marine resources planning and governance, not just environmental protection; and the fact that marine spatial planning can be considered as the integrated tools (Chang and Lin, 2016;Carneiro, 2013;Agardy et al, 2011;and Backer, 2011) to resolve the conflicts among marine users (Calado and Bentz, 2013).…”

Section: Marine Spatial Planning Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The element of economic represents the ability of current plan to achieve economic growth and achieving objectives for marine resources (Blackstock et al, 2015;Carter, 2014;Carneiro, 2013 andCalado et al, 2012).…”

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ecological element deals with the development related to managing marine resources, optimizing the potential of environmental resources and improved protection and enhancement of the marine environment (Chaffin et al, 2016;Carter, 2014;Carcamo et al, 2014;Carneiro, 2013;Calado et al, 2012;Capistrano, 2007 andCarvalho andClarke, 1998). It also reduces the risk of damage to ecosystems sustainably.…”

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, the marine planning will assist in promoting the appreciation, understanding and a sense of ownership of the diversity of the marine environment (Carter, 2014;Carcamo et al, 2014;Carneiro, 2013;Calado et al, 2012 andCapistrano, 2007). The social pillar will improve the quality of life for coastal communities through stronger connection between coastal economies and environment development.…”

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Institutional Mapping Towards Developing a Framework for Sustainable Marine Spatial Planning

YATIM

Omar

Abdullah

et al. 2016

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Within few years before, the urge to implement the marine spatial planning is due to increasing numbers of marine activities that will lead into uncertainties of rights, restrictions and responsibilities of the maritime nations. Marine authorities in this situation that deal with national rights and legislations are the government institutions that engage with marine spatial information. There are several elements to be considered when dealing with the marine spatial planning; which is institutional sustainability governance. Providing the importance of marine spatial planning towards sustainable marine spatial governance, the focus should highlight the role marine institutions towards sustainable marine plan. The iterative process of marine spatial planning among marine institutions is important as the spatial information governance is scattered from reflected rights, restrictions and responsibilities of marine government institutions. Malaysia is one of the maritime nations that conjures the initial step towards establishing the sustainable marine spatial planning. In order to have sustainable institutions in marine spatial planning process, it involves four main stages; planning phase, plan evaluation phase, implementation phase and post implementation phase. Current situation has witnessed the unclear direction and role of marine government institutions to manage the marine spatial information. This review paper is focusing on the institutional sustainability upon interaction of marine government institutions in the marine spatial planning process based on Institutional Analysis Framework. The outcome of the integration of institutional sustainability and marine spatial planning process will propose a framework of marine institutional sustainable plan.

show abstract

Section: Marine Spatial Planning Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sustainability Elements In the Ecosystem Based Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Institutional Mapping Towards Developing a Framework for Sustainable Marine Spatial Planning

YATIM

Omar

Abdullah

et al. 2016

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Marine spatial planning has been heralded as a key initiative to improve marine governance of nature protection and sustainable resource use [1][2][3][4][5]. To protect ecosystem integrity, the Ecosystem Approach has been conceptualised as a boundary condition for blue growth, that is, economic development based on marine resource uses and other maritime activities must be undertaken within the limitations of the ecosystem [4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collective action and agency in Baltic Sea marine spatial planning: Transnational policy coordination in the promotion of regional coherence

Haßler

Gee²,

Gilek

et al. 2018

Marine Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the increasing attention given to marine spatial planning and the widely acknowledged need for transnational policy coordination, regional coherence has not yet improved a great deal in the Baltic Sea region. Therefore, the main objectives in this article are: (a) to map existing governance structures at all levels that influence how domestic marine spatial planning policy strategies are formed, (b) to identify specific challenges to improved regional cooperation and coordination, and (c) to discuss possible remedies. Based on data from indepth case studies carried out in the BONUS BALTSPACE research project, it is shown that, despite the shared goal of sustainability and efficient resource use in relevant EU Directives, action plans and other policy instruments, domestic plans are emerging in diverse ways, mainly reflecting varying domestic administrative structures, sectoral interests, political prioritisations, and handling of potentially conflicting policy objectives. A fruitful distinction can be made between, on the one hand, regulatory institutions and structures above the state level where decision-making mechanisms are typically grounded in consensual regimes and, on the other hand, bilateral, issue-specific collaboration, typically between adjacent countries. It is argued that, to improve overall marine spatial planning governance, these two governance components need to be brought together to improve consistency between regional alignment and to enhance opportunities for countries to collaborate at lower levels. Issue-specific transnational working groups or workshops can be one way to identify and act upon such potential synergies.

show abstract

Regional Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Greening Blue Economy in the Bay of Bengal

Alam

2021

Sustainability in the Maritime Domain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of marine spatial planning

Cited by 57 publications

References 40 publications

Institutional Mapping Towards Developing a Framework for Sustainable Marine Spatial Planning

Institutional Mapping Towards Developing a Framework for Sustainable Marine Spatial Planning

Collective action and agency in Baltic Sea marine spatial planning: Transnational policy coordination in the promotion of regional coherence

Regional Marine Spatial Planning: A Tool for Greening Blue Economy in the Bay of Bengal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About