Evaluation of Methods Based on CPTu Testing for Prediction of the Bearing Capacity of CFA Piles

Abstract

Analysis of pile bearing capacity is an important task in the investigation of soil-structure interaction. The paper is dedicated to the prediction methods for the pile bearing capacity calculation based on the cone penetration test (CPTu) results, namely UniCone method, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées method (LCPC), and the method involved in the Eurocode 7—2. A set of CFA piles was tested to obtain reference bearing capacity. The ability of the prediction methods to determine the bearing capacity of the pile was investigated. In each evaluation criteria using statistical tools, the methods were ranked based on their performance. The results of the study indicate that the UniCone method is most applicable for the given conditions. The EC 7—2 method showed the largest variability of results, and we do not recommend its application without a deeper analysis. The applicability of any presented method cannot be considered final or universal. It is advisable to use more modern and updated methods which have been developed from a larger database of pile tests. The development of these methods should continue by expanding the database of tested piles together with the application of more advanced rock environment testing procedures.

Comparative Investigation of Axial Bearing Performance and Mechanism of Continuous Flight Auger Pile in Weathered Granitic Soils

“…Doan and Lehane [11] proposed a new CPT-based design approach for CFA piles where the soil behavior index was considered. Similar work can also be found in Mihálik et al [12]. Nevertheless, Zacarin et al [13] reported a seasonal variation of shaft resistances of CFA piles in unsaturated soil; that is, the time-dependent soil property should be considered in predicting CFA capacity.…”

Tailings Behavior Assessment Using Piezocone Penetration Test

“…Predicting settlements of natural soils based on CPTU is often recommended [4,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The recommendation typically pertains to estimating settlements according to Equation (17).…”