1990
DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(90)90105-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of methods for the chemical control of rhizoctonia root rot of wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several earlier reports have highlighted seed treatments (rather than soil treatments) as ideal means to target and deliver fungicides to counter R. solani AG-8 or other soil-borne pathogens of cereals (e.g., Cook, 2001;Cotterill, 1991;Cotterill et al, 1990;Smiley and Patterson, 1995). In terms of environmental benefits, fungicide delivery via seed treatment means much less fungicide per hectare is needed to achieve an equivalent rate of disease control as compared with the amount needed by soil application (Smiley and Patterson, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several earlier reports have highlighted seed treatments (rather than soil treatments) as ideal means to target and deliver fungicides to counter R. solani AG-8 or other soil-borne pathogens of cereals (e.g., Cook, 2001;Cotterill, 1991;Cotterill et al, 1990;Smiley and Patterson, 1995). In terms of environmental benefits, fungicide delivery via seed treatment means much less fungicide per hectare is needed to achieve an equivalent rate of disease control as compared with the amount needed by soil application (Smiley and Patterson, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%